From: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Gerlando Falauto
<gerlando.falauto-SkAbAL50j+5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
Martin Belanger
<martin.belanger-Ir6+u9MVKBtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rodolfo Giometti
<giometti-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Michael Lawnick <ml.lawnick-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>,
Jeroen De Wachter
<jeroen.de.wachter-CNXmb7IdZIWZIoH1IeqzKA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mux: create proper topology in sysfs
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:39:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141103203951.GA18530@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414960809-16860-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 09:40:09PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> The current implementation creates muxed i2c-<n> busses as immediate
> children of their i2c-<n> parent bus. In case of multiple muxes on one
> bus, it is impossible to determine which muxed bus comes from which mux.
>
> Change the topology so that they are created under the corresponding mux
> device. This way, multiple muxes on the same segment can coexist and
> children busses are grouped accordingly.
>
> So for instance, by adding a pca9547 device with address 0x70 to
> bus i2c-0, instead of:
>
> /sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-0/device/i2c-1
> ...
> /sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-0/device/i2c-8
>
> we get:
>
> /sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-0/device/0-0070/i2c-1
> ...
> /sys/class/i2c-dev/i2c-0/device/0-0070/i2c-8
>
> Symlinks for backward compatibility are provided.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto-SkAbAL50j+5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>
> [wsa: Ported to top-of-tree (1 line left :)) and added the compatibility
> links.]
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Martin Belanger <martin.belanger-Ir6+u9MVKBtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Michael Lawnick <ml.lawnick-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Jeroen De Wachter <jeroen.de.wachter-CNXmb7IdZIWZIoH1IeqzKA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>
> So, this is what I came up with to fix the mux-topology problem. Since I don't
> really use muxes, please review/comment/test. And give Acks/Tested-by tags if
> this works for you.
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> index 2d0847b6be62..5b482ea32faf 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ struct i2c_adapter *i2c_add_mux_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *parent,
> priv->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> priv->adap.algo = &priv->algo;
> priv->adap.algo_data = priv;
> - priv->adap.dev.parent = &parent->dev;
> + priv->adap.dev.parent = mux_dev;
Not sure if the reason is that i2c mux adapters assume that the parent
device is the i2c adapter, but the code crashes all over the place for me
after applying this patch. I'll try to track it down.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-03 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-02 20:40 [PATCH] i2c: mux: create proper topology in sysfs Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1414960809-16860-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-03 20:39 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-11-03 20:55 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20141103205534.GA18937-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-03 21:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-03 22:18 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20141103221850.GA16026-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-04 7:33 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-04 9:07 ` Danielle Costantino
[not found] ` <CAAVjN7dPet_nBHcQzPYknfiWnf1hD5d5NAJcrNEKKJHYHcBNkg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-10 20:57 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20141110215704.07d7ca1d-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-12 12:35 ` Danielle Costantino
2014-11-04 14:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-11-03 22:49 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20141103224908.GA18594-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-11-04 14:33 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-04 14:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-11-05 14:26 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141103203951.GA18530@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux-0h96xk9xttrk1umjsbkqmq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gerlando.falauto-SkAbAL50j+5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=giometti-AVVDYK/kqiJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jeroen.de.wachter-CNXmb7IdZIWZIoH1IeqzKA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=martin.belanger-Ir6+u9MVKBtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ml.lawnick-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox