From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [4/5] i2c: davinci: use bus recovery infrastructure Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 21:36:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20141123203634.GG4431@pengutronix.de> References: <1416477788-5544-5-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20141121190744.GB4431@pengutronix.de> <546F9382.40102@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <546F9382.40102-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Grygorii Strashko Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , Santosh Shilimkar , Murali Karicheri List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hello Grygorii, On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 09:33:22PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 11/21/2014 09:07 PM, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:03:07PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > > Just another general comment about the driver that doesn't influenc= e the > > correctness of this patch: The i2c-davinci driver is quite quick to > > reset the bus. I wonder how often this reset triggers. Is the bus i= n > > question less "stable" than others? >=20 > In comparison to ..? :) In comparison to other bus drivers in other SoCs. I know this might be hard to answer. I just wonder where the reason for this has to be located. Strange hardware? Software bug? Or is this SoC just operating with strange slaves more often than others? Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig = | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/= |