From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
Cc: jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
Lawnick Michael 61283229
<michael.lawnick-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect DT property to PCA954x mux driver
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:19:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150115131935.GE2549@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B7BBF5.4010001-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1813 bytes --]
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 02:09:09PM +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hi Wolfram!
>
> On 15/01/15 13:32, ext Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:00:10PM +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> >> of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect DT property to PCA954x mux driver
> >>
> >> Add idle-disconnect device tree property to PCA954x mux driver. The new property
> >> forces the multiplexer to disconnect child buses in idle state. This is used, for
> >> example, when there are several multiplexers on the same bus and the devices on
> >> the underlying buses might have same I2C addresses.
> >
> > Basically OK. Question to DT maintainers: "idle-disconnect",
> > "i2c-mux-idle-disconnect", or is there another existing binding we could
> > use?
> >
> >> At the same time old (and not used in the tree) platform data binding
> >> deselect_on_exit is removed to simplify the implementation. Old binding has
> >> different (per-channel) semantics and doesn't fit well in the new concept.
> >
> > I'd prefer to keep it. It should be only one || more. It is not really
> > in the way IMO.
>
> It complicates the implementation 3x times :) This is part of our discussion with Laurent:
Does it? I don't want DT and platform_data to behave equally. I just
want to keep being backwards compatible. So, I'd suggest:
(pdata && pdata->modes[num].deselect_on_exit) || idle_disconnect ? pca954x_deselect_mux : NULL);
> > I'm not keen to brake out-of-tree code (if any), but may be it will be
> > decided to drop this per-channel deselect_on_exit, because it's not used at
> > least in the kernel tree...
I couldn't find a user of the platform_data, at all. But removing
platform_data support is a seperate patch, and deprecating platform_data
is a seperate and general issue IMO.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-19 17:00 [PATCH v2] of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect DT property to PCA954x mux driver Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <5494599A.8050803-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-15 12:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 13:09 ` Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <54B7BBF5.4010001-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-15 13:19 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-01-15 13:35 ` Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <54B7C206.8030809-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-19 13:29 ` [PATCH v3] of: i2c: Add i2c-mux-idle-disconnect " Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <54BD069C.2080108-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-22 14:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-23 15:41 ` [PATCH v4] " Alexander Sverdlin
[not found] ` <54C26BA9.4050405-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-23 16:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-01-15 14:40 ` [PATCH v2] of: i2c: Add idle-disconnect " Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-15 15:48 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150115131935.GE2549@katana \
--to=wsa-z923lk4zbo2bacvfa/9k2g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=michael.lawnick-OYasijW0DpE@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).