From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c-tools: i2ctransfer: add new tool Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 20:28:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20150508182831.GN12671@pengutronix.de> References: <1425053816-19804-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <20150507220812.3776bb83@endymion.delvare> <20150508105401.223a8598@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Grunwell Cc: "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Magnus Damm , Simon Horman , Laurent Pinchart , Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Wolfram Sang , Jean Delvare List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hello Randy, On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 03:28:19PM +0000, Randy Grunwell wrote: > I'm curious why this would not be an extension of the i2c read and wr= ite commands? Would it not make sense to add a tier above "Block" (perh= aps "Extended"), and use the same syntax? >=20 > Forgive me if this is out of place - I'm quite new, both here and to = Linux/C. one thing you should look into is how you quote mails correctly and please don't top-post. Also breaking long lines after ~72 chars is usually done. These requests might seem picky, but they simplify things for people reading several hundred mails per day. Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig = | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/= |