From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-tools: enable static use of libi2c
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:06:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150617110615.7c7cb411@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434420079-3029-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Hallo Wolfram,
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 04:01:19 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas-jBu1N2QxHDJrcw3mvpCnnVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
>
> When debugging embedded systems, it is often nice to simply TFTP the
> desired i2ctool to the target without the hazzle of dealing with shared
> libs. Using -static is overkill, too, so let's add a switch which will
> only link functions from libi2c statically.
Fine with me.
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas-jBu1N2QxHDJrcw3mvpCnnVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Makefile | 2 ++
> tools/Module.mk | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 252a126..6d36f2f 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ CFLAGS += -Wall
> SOCFLAGS := -fpic -D_REENTRANT $(CFLAGS)
>
> BUILD_STATIC_LIB ?= 1
> +# Uncomment to use static libi2c
> +#USE_STATIC_LIB := 1
Any reason for not using ?= as above, with the default being unset?
That way BUILD_STATIC_LIB and USE_STATIC_LIB can both be controlled
using the same mechanism, and can be changed from their default value
on the command line (without patching the Makefile.)
>
> KERNELVERSION := $(shell uname -r)
>
> diff --git a/tools/Module.mk b/tools/Module.mk
> index d14bb0c..8efddbb 100644
> --- a/tools/Module.mk
> +++ b/tools/Module.mk
> @@ -12,7 +12,11 @@ TOOLS_DIR := tools
> TOOLS_CFLAGS := -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual \
> -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wnested-externs -Winline \
> -W -Wundef -Wmissing-prototypes -Iinclude
> +ifeq ($(USE_STATIC_LIB),1)
> +TOOLS_LDFLAGS := $(LIB_DIR)/$(LIB_STLIBNAME)
> +else
> TOOLS_LDFLAGS := -Llib -li2c
> +endif
Unrelated to your patch, but shouldn't this -Llib rather been written
-L$(LIB_DIR)?
Also it might make sense to check if USE_STATIC_LIB is set when
BUILD_STATIC_LIB isn't and complain about it?
>
> TOOLS_TARGETS := i2cdetect i2cdump i2cset i2cget
>
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-17 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 2:01 [PATCH] i2c-tools: enable static use of libi2c Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1434420079-3029-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 9:06 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2015-06-17 10:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-06-17 13:10 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20150617151025.1353abe3-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 13:20 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150617110615.7c7cb411@endymion.delvare \
--to=jdelvare-l3a5bk7wagm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).