From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 0/8] i2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:30:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20150911163035.GE18779@x1> References: <1441972564-9621-1-git-send-email-kieranbingham@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1441972564-9621-1-git-send-email-kieranbingham@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kieran Bingham Cc: Wolfram Sang , Samuel Ortiz , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org, javier@osg.samsung.com List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Kieran Bingham wrote: > Hi Wolfram, >=20 > I have picked this patchset [0] up from Lee to rebase it, with an aim= to > get this series moving again. >=20 > This resend fixes up my SoB's as highlighted by Lee >=20 > A couple of minor issues were resolved in the rebase. As it stood, Ja= vier > proposed [1] to merge this series, and use a follow up series to make= sure > that all I2C drivers are using a MODLE_DEVICE_TABLE(of,...) >=20 > I have prepared a Coccinelle patch to work through the bulk of the ch= anges > required for the conversion, which will assist the transition process= =2E >=20 > Once this patch set is accepted, I will commence converting the other > drivers, and submitting with a per subsystem breakdown or simliar to > reduce traffic. >=20 > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/28/283 > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/12/496 I appreciate that my SoB is on every patch, but this set still looks good to me, so for extra clarification: Acked-by: Lee Jones [...] --=20 Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog