From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: rcar: call rcar_i2c_init() after pm_runtime_get_sync() Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 20:17:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20151029191740.GC8992@katana> References: <87oafiyq8y.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , Simon , Linux I2C , Magnus , Linux-sh list List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Hence now it's done again for every transfer? >=20 > What about moving it just before the call to i2c_add_numbered_adapter(), > and wrapping it inside pm_runtime_get_sync(dev)/pm_runtime_put()? >=20 > Wolfram, what do you think? I'd prefer the latter. Sending a tested patch in a second... --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWMnDUAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2vboP/116uPGS0lb2dF4qicnIBAUe i5X3XxFG/AZU36aglT6e/UyueyT+SwxPeub78TeXnLg9kWENFShE9DdLdP+A/5zI CcwbFoVt6OgCiMGfFQz1QnZcoZYb/hUMHdX+qhRUpkTxwRMl4fCjbsEnYfRkw52g +3GP3gqqbqXlfVc7myrPssm7OEio2sifJOKe1HJKOdF47dbO0OcS3YDl7BpG2fH1 cYWf073/FM0Nr3EypvpagfUblhuoN8nW57EqSiB5cS/ojbrvEsIMrtTRcmQWXPO8 zqJJvSPSc+7fLJ+D3HWgH8jHeaJtiR4G5wkJvJ7RFJE9gyxXQILiwDUWMExUvnFS OQy0f1ovLhfk+VGp3k28FpmXE8KoiQWExCAtJS4+CVbF3ki/QcZn80imPs2qCbZk S6/lL3bSvhqY7iS5I9UVadwkTHvXEmi9X+7r7wgxmGEmJlUlX3+dYxcggbujLAN/ 0Qxyh6ayycZZ8sRzrGNWlQw4wWxVgZYibA5d8M+jzNm39gw3g9nGozRHFnWFVErH 56aCPFnEgOoYxOA4dzFkuH2hWhslowWTlmK3EVu/diHL75UNCPEs+7ytvJK+Okpy EFivBKowd7BVUTw5suzVotaCYUTiWiYPzzzoGWVzyTTLzWDlEHlMU/2/EASysvtm 5HEEOL7SLuhFhlgeY0j5 =Ve6o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR--