From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] i2c: designware: Convert to use unified device property API Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 10:53:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20151202095339.GC1555@katana> References: <1448896304-87928-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20151130195858.GB16446@katana> <1448966031.15393.131.camel@linux.intel.com> <3465575.VLD33ozkzD@vostro.rjw.lan> <1449048220.15393.141.camel@linux.intel.com> <20151202093341.GM1593@lahna.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7gGkHNMELEOhSGF6" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151202093341.GM1593@lahna.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Andy Shevchenko , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jarkko Nikula , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones , Kevin Fenzi , Arnd Bergmann List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --7gGkHNMELEOhSGF6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:33:41AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:23:40AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 02:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:33:51 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 20:58 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:11:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > > > > What is the bug fix here described in the cover letter? > > > >=20 > > > > The cover letter mentioned 'last part' which I refer to as patches > > > > 14, > > > > 15 (though this is for UART), and 16. > > >=20 > > > Hmm. > > >=20 > > > So may I assume that patches [1-13/16] are for me and the rest is to > > > be applied > > > by the other respective maintainers? > > >=20 > > > That should be easiest logistically IMHO. > >=20 > > Have no objections. >=20 > Unfortunately the patches (except this one) depend on each other so they > cannot be applied separately. So, why not let all of them go in in one go? For this patch: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang --7gGkHNMELEOhSGF6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWXr+jAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2b1AP/1Iyh8gCzMaNeydZHmvUb7rb 2zWS+0M+uGgANpLGoKds2LpkmBlxrXByrSnC+1b+bRd/BsM3G6vCLealzpgBKelL /DxNHt51e1zgJf7NOm+tSTF0R0+nMyEYTs3MIuDufyGRT9V6SDDXAP2GjaUrScjb 3TwRM5kOWNbscEsA4jzSTsyJwquPoT4dJnStWEvRRZ4jGoU2zB+6y+Zzz+cjmmTe lizsQUNFD8vwMtk2B4e7TeiqglgipbhpcswYSlQDuLSdYLTPamfvWu+UyvHXG09k rBjpklgC1evzmN1UsN8FbipPqjyzutkKc+Sp4louEp/N13TxNqq/eysm6//iUmF+ yDexu6H2GFnEJeOMwHy8eXyYGzUgdIFls5UsKy5ZafzHHpwO/fE7J3O1fIUaGOuZ /PBgcLrJRyJ6d9Y14D8oquK8HgRizcR+0786Q5OW66CMGDF/vpK4WCzM3LfSvuTP KzIUKpzf8CytfJF26AyDXad1iVYNkTqcmw2LCLzu1w1VmwZNiG1T7K0EyFPKpF7Z AOb0rI/XUrhxlxelqtpXPQ8L/7FqHj1LmcYteYxdRW6ZoGDCBw4P5lft5lgQmyu7 TSiCGvTV5dwhcBB3FQ6qFYJfnmysIqXGMHw2Tk6QJINUyotpG6oHUj1F5B7+eCB/ 8WMgrzvSxFCb08ZZ24k2 =tDse -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7gGkHNMELEOhSGF6--