From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: Question on device tree bindings for I2C Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 17:35:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20151207163542.GA1647@katana> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Return-path: Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:57834 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932218AbbLGQfr (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:35:47 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: M'boumba Cedric Madianga Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Do you have any recommendation for that purpose ? I prefer i2c-xxxx.txt. Happy hacking, Wolfram --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWZbVdAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2oscP+gOJVxJo62SW17x3PFfJ8O7i QeG38w/sNrxSHvYJvl/4oBmnaSyU3DC/yByH0b6RdvR9QCBJlfGe2orTByB0z2Ax rCHgPb+QW9JjtDsNrnzEPJrtrxijanLOj5uTbaH4xBEq88VhkEXU/sE7QYQG5MN/ jRytQxu84BEwrjCmcV8SRgAA794OHr/MLxDwGq+D3KpaYDdj4Mw0mYyYCy+gdDtR b0KLMLCeGzt9b4CvmW/F+avbe7DUpvKnLODoZidpdLrT4cU6H/oZAII02YDnHn3R MCX4NNAB43ZaPvGNaDtepeCX9mKNgw0+s2mq7tL6uQVBESMxm03Z3o+UBwAapXcW OYFRDnojuViFCkks1DY1xjfbpoWXnK1CUubgQtz7LL0ahGskfiRrdiVEbJm/lIhq Tept0xbMDoinOc5ZR31kRqTiPtl1ahZ3/AeQlpKf3GKSPT3l1jWeAztoldbuS5x0 wYJpfm0Cf/TrbNBNqYLKoVnxYHh1LvtpkxALdp5C0mWROnOn7UWfcAIR1if9XIFC Gau96EGPkiKkwfQztyq38X5YIjtOmXtx70oyzYBZ8XjOG7B1tFEgLH54ahw2dTgj qDG9K4jtgEKdkWIg7q+aKDuoC7PN9k3R89RWWQApUKkAhR9SI7CwG0EYdtXTgtaN j0NHC9xCS/WRcVhnmJNh =cyAO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--