linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, lho@apm.com, Ken.Xue@amd.com,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:04:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151216150446.GY1762@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <567178D2.30002@amd.com>

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 08:44:34AM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> I am trying to avoid having to hard-coded clock frequency value in the
> driver. Would it be alright to not return w/ error, and just do the
> following?
> 
> 	dev->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> 	if (!IS_ERR(dev->clk))
> 		dev->get_clk_rate_khz = i2c_dw_get_clk_rate_khz;
> 
> This should work for the Intel case when clock is also provided.

Does it also work when clk_prepare_enable()/disable() is called for the
clock (in PM callbacks for example)? If yes, then I don't see problems
with what you are suggesting.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-16 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-15 22:38 [PATCH] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-12-16  9:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-12-16 14:11   ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-12-16 14:28     ` Mika Westerberg
2015-12-16 14:44       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-12-16 15:04         ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2015-12-17  0:55 ` Loc Ho

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151216150446.GY1762@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Ken.Xue@amd.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lho@apm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).