From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Do not require clock when SSCN and FFCN are provided Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:44:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20151223084410.GH1758@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1450319025-19120-1-git-send-email-Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> <20151218101348.GG1762@lahna.fi.intel.com> <5679B7C1.6010408@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:32077 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754971AbbLWIqW (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:46:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5679B7C1.6010408@amd.com> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Suravee Suthikulanit Cc: wsa@the-dreams.de, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, lho@apm.com, Ken.Xue@amd.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:51:13PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote: > So, at this point, I can re-submit the V3 and combine these changes, and we > both can sign-off. How does that sound? Sounds good to me :)