From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: retry transfer on transient failure Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 06:40:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20160106044017.GB18161@tarshish> References: <1451320480.30729.351.camel@linux.intel.com> <20160104194949.GE1522@katana> <1451996548.30729.398.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from guitar.tcltek.co.il ([192.115.133.116]:55137 "EHLO mx.tkos.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751969AbcAFEkZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jan 2016 23:40:25 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1451996548.30729.398.camel@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Wolfram Sang , Jarkko Nikula , Mika Westerberg , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Rolland Chau Hi Andy, On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:22:28PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 20:49 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > I'm okay with the original patch putting some "sane" initial value. > > It can be modified at runtime via a i2c-dev ioctl if needed. > > Ah, good. So, I'm fine with it if no one has strong argument. So can you give your ack to the original patch then? Thanks, baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -