From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: fetzerch <fetzer.ch@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, wsa@the-dreams.de,
galandilias@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Support multiplexed main SMBus interface on SB800
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:13:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160125121314.73acc965@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56A3846F.9000908@googlemail.com>
Hi Christian,
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:47:27 +0100, fetzerch wrote:
> On 22.01.2016 13:50, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:13:46 +0100, Christian Fetzer wrote:
> >> The patched driver is running stable on the machine, given that ic2_piix4 is
> >> loaded before jc42 and w83795. If jc42 is loaded before i2c_piix4 calling
> >> sensors triggers some errors:
> >> ERROR: Can't get value of subfeature temp1_min_alarm: Can't read
> >>
> >> While the kernel log shows:
> >> i2c i2c-1: Transaction (pre): CNT=0c, CMD=05, ADD=31, DAT0=03, DAT1=c0
> >> i2c i2c-1: Error: no response!
> >> i2c i2c-1: Transaction (post): CNT=0c, CMD=05, ADD=31, DAT0=ff, DAT1=ff
> >> Unfortunately I don't know how to tackle this specific issue.
> >
> > I think I can explain it. In piix4_setup_sb800() you touch the
> > SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX port without first taking the mutex that protects
> > it. You only take the mutex on transactions (in piix4_access_sb800) not
> > during initialization. If self-probing I2C device drivers such as jc42
> > are already loaded before you load i2c-piix4, then as soon as the first
> > SMBus port is registered, i2c-core will try to attach I2C devices to
> > it, while at the same time i2c-piix4 is registering the second SMBus
> > port. So SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX is changed while piix4_access_sb800
> > accesses it and chaos happens.
> >
> > I think if we had proper locking in piix4_setup_sb800() then you should
> > be able to load jc42 first and then i2c-piix4 and it should work fine.
>
> Since the problem remains even after your patch, I'll try to provide
> more information about the issue.
OK, I think I see what's going on here.
The i2c buses begin to exist for the kernel when i2c_add_adapter()
is called. This happens in piix4_add_adapter(), which is called from
two sites: piix4_probe() directly for the legacy devices and for the
aux SMBus controller, and piix4_add_adapters_sb800() for the muxed main
controller of the SB800.
Now if you look at piix4_add_adapters_sb800(), you can see that right
_after_ calling piix4_add_adapter(), the code grabs the
adapter-specific data (struct i2c_piix4_adapdata *adapdata) and sets
two fields there: sb800_main and port. While sb800_main isn't needed
before module removal in piix4_adap_remove(), port is used in
piix4_access_sb800(), which can be called immediately after
i2c_add_adapter() returns (possibly even slightly before that.)
So we have a small window during which piix4_access_sb800() can be
called and adapdata->port has not been set yet, so it still has its
default value of 0 for all ports. Hence the kernel reads from port 0
for all of SMBus channels 0, 2, 3 and 4. This completely explains the
symptoms you described.
Additionally I see that the algorithm is overwritten also right after
piix4_add_adapter() is called. So odds are that piix4_access_sb800()
isn't even called when the already loaded jc42 or w83795 driver probes
for devices. Instead piix4_access() is called, so no locking and no
port selection takes place at all.
The only right way to handle this is to set all fields of the
i2c_adapter _and_ its associated struct i2c_piix4_adapdata _before_
i2c_add_adapter() is called. Anything else is just racy by design.
I'll post a patch for you to try shortly.
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-25 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-19 19:13 [PATCH v5 0/3] Support multiplexed main SMBus interface on SB800 Christian Fetzer
2015-11-19 19:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] i2c-piix4: Convert piix4_main_adapter to array Christian Fetzer
2015-11-19 19:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] i2c-piix4: Add support for multiplexed main adapter in SB800 Christian Fetzer
2015-11-19 19:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] i2c-piix4: Add adapter port name support for SB800 chipset Christian Fetzer
2016-01-22 13:20 ` Jean Delvare
2015-11-30 13:37 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Support multiplexed main SMBus interface on SB800 Wolfram Sang
2016-01-22 12:50 ` Jean Delvare
2016-01-23 13:47 ` fetzerch
2016-01-24 9:16 ` Jean Delvare
2016-01-24 12:07 ` Rudolf Marek
2016-01-25 11:13 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2016-01-25 21:53 ` Christian Fetzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160125121314.73acc965@endymion.delvare \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fetzer.ch@gmail.com \
--cc=galandilias@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).