From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-piix4: Better bus names Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:03:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20160127150308.GA1778@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20160127144033.749e3652@endymion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:53841 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933095AbcA0PGB (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:06:01 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160127144033.749e3652@endymion.delvare> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux I2C , Christian Fetzer , Andy Shevchenko , Wolfram Sang On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 02:40:33PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > The I2C bus names are supposed to be stable as they can be used by > userspace to uniquely identify a specific I2C bus. So restore the > original names for all legacy (pre-SB800) devices. Good point. I missed the fact that these get exposed to userspace. > > For SB800 devices and later, improve the names. "SDA" refers to the > serial data pin of each SMBus port, it's an implementation detail the > user doesn't need to know. Use "port" instead, which is easier to > understand. > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare > Cc: Christian Fetzer > Cc: Mika Westerberg Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg