linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: designware: Allow build Baytrail semaphore support when IOSF_MBI=m
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 23:27:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160412212755.GD1526@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160105222100.GA25443@pathfinder>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 642 bytes --]

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:21:00PM -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Sorry I missed this discussion. I believe the following code in
> i2c_dw_eval_lock_support() should make it so that it doesn't matter how
> IOSF_MBI is built:
> 
>    if (!iosf_mbi_available())
>            return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> 
> I added this to address i2c_designware probing before iosf_mbi. It worked but
> I do not recall if IOSF_MBI=m was the problem scenario. If so you can just
> change it to:
> 
>    depends in I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM && IOSF_MBI
>     
> Give me a few days to confirm on my Baytrail device. 

What is the status here?


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-12 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-10 11:48 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Keep pm_runtime_enable/_disable calls in sync Jarkko Nikula
2015-12-10 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: designware: Allow build Baytrail semaphore support when IOSF_MBI=m Jarkko Nikula
2015-12-10 12:59   ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-12-10 13:56     ` Jarkko Nikula
2016-01-04 19:51       ` Wolfram Sang
2016-01-05 22:21   ` David E. Box
2016-04-12 21:27     ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2016-04-12 21:46   ` David E. Box
2016-06-19 17:31   ` Wolfram Sang
2015-12-12 17:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Keep pm_runtime_enable/_disable calls in sync Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160412212755.GD1526@katana \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).