From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: Add generic support passing secondary devices
 addresses
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:41:26 +0300
Message-ID: <20160425074126.GL1725@lahna.fi.intel.com>
References: <1460992811.8946.22.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <5714FCBE.3060009@metafoo.de>
 <20160419124028.GF1725@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <57162C4E.9090904@metafoo.de>
 <20160419131631.GG1725@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <5716333D.1040106@metafoo.de>
 <20160419144027.GH1725@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <20160424201437.GA2123@katana>
 <20160425072553.GK1725@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <20160425073940.GD1541@katana>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:24146 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753823AbcDYHld (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 03:41:33 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160425073940.GD1541@katana>
Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, galak@codeaurora.org, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, mark.rutland@arm.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, Jean-Michel Hautbois <jean-michel.hautbois@veo-labs.com>

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:39:41AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:25:53AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:14:37PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The above should work with both DT and ACPI so I'm OK with the current
> > > > patch. We can add ACPI parts later when needed.
> > > 
> > > Just to make sure, I read this as an ack for the original patch?
> > 
> > Yes :)
> 
> Thanks! Could you use the formal tag for that in the future please?
> Patchwork automatically collects them and that saves me some work. (I
> even have a keyboard macro for that and use it a lot)

Sure, sorry about that.

Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>