From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 23:00:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201604292300.23616@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXO128w2ZyCj3TV96gS0k_f+9THYmT-Au7s26TLB18tpA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 3989 bytes --]
On Friday 29 April 2016 20:10:23 Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 April 2016 11:34:38 Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On 04/28/2016 03:23 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >> >Many Intel systems the BIOS declares a SystemIO OpRegion below
> >> >the SMBus
> >> >
> >> >PCI device as can be seen in ACPI DSDT table from Lenovo Yoga 900:
> >> > Device (SBUS)
> >> > {
> >> >
> >> > OperationRegion (SMBI, SystemIO, (SBAR << 0x05), 0x10)
> >> > Field (SMBI, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
> >> > {
> >> >
> >> > HSTS, 8,
> >> > Offset (0x02),
> >> > HCON, 8,
> >> > HCOM, 8,
> >> > TXSA, 8,
> >> > DAT0, 8,
> >> > DAT1, 8,
> >> > HBDR, 8,
> >> > PECR, 8,
> >> > RXSA, 8,
> >> > SDAT, 16
> >> >
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> >There are also bunch of ASL methods that that the BIOS can use to
> >> >access these fields. Most of the systems in question ASL methods
> >> >accessing the SMBI OpRegion are never used.
> >> >
> >> >Now, because of this SMBI OpRegion many systems fail to load the
> >> >SMBus
> >> >
> >> >driver with an error looking like one below:
> >> > ACPI Warning: SystemIO range
> >> > 0x0000000000003040-0x000000000000305F
> >> >
> >> > conflicts with OpRegion
> >> > 0x0000000000003040-0x000000000000304F
> >> > (\_SB.PCI0.SBUS.SMBI) (20160108/utaddress-255)
> >> >
> >> > ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you
> >> > should use
> >> >
> >> > it instead of the native driver
> >> >
> >> >The reason is that this SMBI OpRegion conflicts with the PCI BAR
> >> >used by the SMBus driver.
> >> >
> >> >It turns out that we can install a custom SystemIO address space
> >> >handler for the SMBus device to intercept all accesses through
> >> >that OpRegion. This allows us to share the PCI BAR with the ASL
> >> >code if it for some reason is using it. We do not expect that
> >> >this OpRegion handler will ever be called but if it is we print
> >> >a warning and execute the read/write operation under a lock
> >> >which prevents ASL and OS from messing each other.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> # Dell XPS 13 9350
> >>
> >> This successfully works around:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110041
> >>
> >> but the BIOS people should still fix their ASL. Sigh.
> >>
> >> On the Dell laptop, the observable effect is that the driver loads
> >> and finds the iTCO thing.
> >>
> >> Pali, this may be considerably more useful on your laptop.
> >
> > Andy, I am right that I will be able to load i2c-i801.ko driver
> > without acpi_enforce_resources=lax parameter?
>
> Yes, and it works on my laptop.
Looks like it is working also on my laptop.
> > If yes, then it sounds good! Finally I would be able to bind
> > lis3lv02d_i2c.ko driver for accelerometer which is on my E6440
> > machine.
> >
> > Andy, is there any way to tell i2c-i801.ko driver that on i2c bus
> > (which that driver exports) is present some i2c device? Months ago
> > I got list of Latitude machines on which i2c address is that
> > accelerometer present.
> >
> > It is possible to hardcode that mapping (DMI name of laptop --> i2c
> > address) into dell-laptop driver, so i2c-i801.ko and
> > lis3lv02d_i2c.ko will be automatically loaded and lis3l binded
> > correctly to i801 i2c address?
>
> I don't know how this part works, but I doubt that doing it in
> dell-laptop will be convenient. After all, dell-laptop can load
> before i2c-i801.
>
> Jean and Wolfram: is there a quirk mechanism to add i2c devices that
> aren't directly enumerable but are known to exist due to DMI?
Maybe something like i2c_register_board_info()?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-28 10:23 [PATCH] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR Mika Westerberg
2016-04-28 18:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-04-29 8:56 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-04-30 1:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-02 10:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-02 11:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-02 12:40 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-02 15:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-02 15:50 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-05-02 15:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-05-02 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-03 8:53 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-04-29 9:03 ` Pali Rohár
2016-04-29 18:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-04-29 21:00 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2016-04-29 21:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-04-30 0:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-04-30 8:12 ` Pali Rohár
2016-05-05 8:27 ` Pali Rohár
[not found] ` <CALCETrW3i7QkVNRo4RQkRViPBo8dSn=4mKDZiA=Ar3v7=dgz1A@mail.gmail.com>
2016-05-07 14:11 ` Pali Rohár
2016-05-07 15:06 ` Jean Delvare
2016-04-29 20:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-02 10:21 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201604292300.23616@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mario_limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).