From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:20:28 +0300 Message-ID: <20160506122028.GF15974@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1462354045-94455-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20160506121249.GP2839@codeblueprint.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:12119 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758054AbcEFMUd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2016 08:20:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160506121249.GP2839@codeblueprint.co.uk> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Matt Fleming Cc: Jean Delvare , Wolfram Sang , Jarkko Nikula , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Lutomirski , Mario Limonciello , pali.rohar@gmail.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 01:12:49PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Wed, 04 May, at 12:27:25PM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > Many Intel systems the BIOS declares a SystemIO OpRegion below the SMBus > > PCI device as can be seen in ACPI DSDT table from Lenovo Yoga 900: > > [...] > > > > Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg > > Given that there are systems shipping with this issue, I think this > should probably be tagged for -stable too, right? Right. I'll add that tag as well in v3.