From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
javier@osg.samsung.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org,
sameo@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/8] 2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 10:14:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509091426.GG8324@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462374888-22888-1-git-send-email-kieran@bingham.xyz>
On Wed, 04 May 2016, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> This patch set finally pops up again, after a long time stuck somewhere in the
> midst of my stack.
>
> As it stood last year, the requirements were to rename probe2 to probe_new, and
> ensure that it was correctly tested. The rename was the easy bit, but the
> testing took me more time to get things set up properly. And other commitments
> then got in the way of things. Of course this patch set has also been rebased
> as well, but there wasn't any major pain there.
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> To try to establish testing, I have used a beagle-bone-black, and a DS1307 RTC
> connected to the BBB SCL and SDA lines. The main reason for these choices is
> accesibility. i.e. I have them, and the BBB readily boots a kernel for me to
> test and iterate with.
>
> I've tested the device with i2cdetect, and then worked through testing the
> sysfs interface, device tree, and module autoloading, each time ensuring that
> the RTC enumerates and operates
>
> * new_device (built-in, and external module)
> echo ds1307 0x68 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-2/new_device
> cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/date
>
> - Both of those worked fine.
>
> * Device Tree
> I tested that the device would still register by adding a node in the device
> tree for the board, and testing with a built-in module.
>
> - This worked fine.
>
> * Module Autoloading
> With the device tree node in the board dts file, it wouldn't automatically
> load from the external module. This was due to the rtc-ds1307 module not
> exporting an of_match table, and not yet having Javier's "report OF style
> modalias when probing using DT" [0] patch applied
>
> - With the module updated, and Javiers patch applied, the module autoloads
>
> Finally, I feel I can safely add this tag to the patch set:
> Tested-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran@bingham.xyz>
Great work Kieran.
Wolfram, Javier,
Looks like Kieran has ticked each of your boxes.
I guess there is nothing stopping this set from being applied now,
right?
> Please let me know if there is any other specific use case missing here that
> needs to be tested.
>
> [0] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/502201/
>
> Patches
> -------
> Lee Jones (8):
> i2c: Add pointer dereference protection to i2c_match_id()
> i2c: Add the ability to match device to compatible string without an
> of_node
> i2c: Match using traditional OF methods, then by vendor-less
> compatible strings
> i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed devices
> i2c: Export i2c_match_id() for direct use by device drivers
> i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new() call-back type
> mfd: 88pm860x: Move over to new I2C device .probe() call
> mfd: as3722: Rid driver of superfluous I2C device ID structure
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c | 5 ++-
> drivers/mfd/as3722.c | 12 ++------
> include/linux/i2c.h | 22 ++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 15:14 [PATCHv5 0/8] 2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Kieran Bingham
2016-05-04 15:14 ` [PATCHv5 1/8] i2c: Add pointer dereference protection to i2c_match_id() Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 4:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-04 15:14 ` [PATCHv5 2/8] i2c: Add the ability to match device to compatible string without an of_node Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 4:57 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-04 15:14 ` [PATCHv5 3/8] i2c: Match using traditional OF methods, then by vendor-less compatible strings Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 4:58 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-04 15:14 ` [PATCHv5 4/8] i2c: Make I2C ID tables non-mandatory for DT'ed devices Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 5:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-04 15:14 ` [PATCHv5 5/8] i2c: Export i2c_match_id() for direct use by device drivers Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 5:02 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-04 15:14 ` [PATCHv5 6/8] i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new() call-back type Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 5:04 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-04 15:14 ` [PATCHv5 7/8] mfd: 88pm860x: Move over to new I2C device .probe() call Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 5:07 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-04 15:14 ` [PATCHv5 8/8] mfd: as3722: Rid driver of superfluous I2C device ID structure Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 5:20 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-10 7:33 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-10 13:23 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-10 14:01 ` Lee Jones
2016-05-10 14:39 ` [PATCH] cocci: Find i2c drivers with an of_device table that isn't exported Kieran Bingham
2016-05-10 15:07 ` [PATCH] cocci: Provide script to find i2c_tables missing exports Kieran Bingham
2016-05-11 20:07 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-09 9:14 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-05-09 13:21 ` [PATCHv5 0/8] 2c: Relax mandatory I2C ID table passing Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-10 5:31 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-05-10 7:48 ` Kieran Bingham
2016-06-09 14:24 ` Lee Jones
2016-06-09 19:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-06-09 19:45 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-06-09 20:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-06-10 10:03 ` Kieran Bingham
2016-06-10 11:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-06-10 12:07 ` Kieran Bingham
2016-06-10 13:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-06-12 21:13 ` [TEST PATCH] rtc: convert ds1307 to interim probe_new Kieran Bingham
2016-06-12 21:26 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-12 21:26 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-13 17:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-07-11 9:13 ` Kieran Bingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509091426.GG8324@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=kieran@ksquared.org.uk \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).