From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Tissoires Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] i2c-smbus: add support for HOST NOTIFY Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:01:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20160607140145.GA19237@mail.corp.redhat.com> References: <1464688985-19102-1-git-send-email-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> <20160605071325.GB2722@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50128 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754426AbcFGOBw (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:01:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160605071325.GB2722@katana> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Corey Minyard , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Dmitry Torokhov , Andrew Duggan , Christopher Heiny , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, On Jun 05 2016 or thereabouts, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > > this is mostly a resubmission of the v6 with the acks, tested-by and few typos > > here and there. > > I actually reviewed v6 but got an NMI so writing the mails fell through > the cracks :( Sorry about that! Good news is that the code is fine from > my point of view, some documentation updates I'd request. After updating > those, I will pick up the core patches right away. Note that while the Great, many thanks! The documentation fixes look simple enough to do. However, I just realized a conflict in the i801 which requires tests (in the resume call). > i801 patch looks good to me, I need Jean's review here. There are other > patches pending for i801, that needs to be coordinated by him. OK. I'll try to fetch those pending patches on patchwork and see how the merge would behave. Cheers, Benjamin > > Thanks, > > Wolfram >