From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [v5] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 11:15:46 +0300 Message-ID: <20160609081546.GA1791@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1463990658-53854-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20160608162913.GA24234@mail.corp.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:55257 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752683AbcFIIPw (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 04:15:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160608162913.GA24234@mail.corp.redhat.com> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Jean Delvare , Wolfram Sang , Jarkko Nikula , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Lutomirski , Mario Limonciello , pali.rohar@gmail.com, Matt Fleming , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 06:29:13PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > - err = acpi_check_resource_conflict(&dev->resource[SMBBAR]); > > - if (err) { > > + err = i801_acpi_probe(priv); > > + if (err) > > return -ENODEV; > > - } > > I'd say that once this has been set, we need to call > acpi_remove_address_space_handler() in case of failure later (in the 2 > returns after). Indeed - I wonder how many mistakes one patch can contain :-( Let me fix this and submit yet another version. > The rest looks OK to me. Thanks!