From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] i2c: meson: allow build with COMPILE_TEST Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 21:12:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20160706201216.GA15529@trinity.fluff.org> References: <1467742788-16431-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <1467743043-18703-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <20160706000935.GA1349@tetsubishi> <5de63894-cb33-f2be-4c53-93e8865a24a9@codethink.co.uk> <20160706081340.GB1439@tetsubishi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from trinity.fluff.org ([89.16.178.74]:34712 "EHLO trinity.fluff.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755787AbcGFUbJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2016 16:31:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160706081340.GB1439@tetsubishi> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Ben Dooks , linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, Ben Dooks , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 05:13:41PM +0900, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks > > > > > > Two signed-offs by you? > > > > two different emails, got a patch written at home left in my work > > tree so used both emails. > > Please pick one so we know what you think if copyright belongs to you or > your employer. I thought I was being correct by having the From: matching the first SoB, and the second being from the account I was sending it from I will re-send from my personal laptop. -- Ben Dooks, ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/ben/ Large Hadron Colada: A large Pina Colada that makes the universe disappear.