From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:16:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20160823211600.GF20872@katana> References: <1469780277-31085-1-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se> <1469780277-31085-3-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z0eOaCaDLjvTGF2l" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1469780277-31085-3-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Rosin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --z0eOaCaDLjvTGF2l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:17:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > This makes it trivial to constify them, so do that. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin Looks good. Could you rebase to i2c/for-next? --z0eOaCaDLjvTGF2l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXvL0QAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2HI4P/RyTA48CcAz1m28T1hy0XJzU dft3Owl8CF6NFGD9VGjk0/mIzyu2BF01+43FfAgNXkSUo4TfDps1V/NXqS31+E50 qyJpPIUn3fP8aQce0FNX7DNpTKeHugAXNfvRK5KTIaNvj1Iu/tIt5COq2MC4SCUk kiWWScEpg4I8m68o2ArjFJWWllogu1iOJuMmmm7+KRiRTgV8rpfiOkaEETO6f8Sd 9IAO3lX4MNUFVEo00kV7m/VfLEiSJH8/3wA1+CItcQSLNkf6v+dCbXzA3XregsJW V/af60P6CfzoZ1Tmp6gVLZf1nwtB/4iNbY+inrul6zP4zebbI6wn/7eOM2uchSOR VQYH/A/uxaHaxAB6kOCuzX5YU9yKWlPpM4u3n1v5piUJgk6BQ6qKRLK4Mj4A6bix hA2DNyFMGI7Kfo4ESwQJBsIhyfnAYoS8dxHKfmKllX+Kf5lCmVB2mxbGjsS/HCsu I3Kf35uysFvWKcEr4zk20afufUFrRqi7QCem/95FDuIhT59F2PcmKfornYBW+2ZK LsIWHuhcnKlImPIlk/9bMpgkcmbMBzWCQ/lgnt/ze9jGW5YFJO4ZfjgbCVpw+Hmh oG4vRcMFvnfqdpGOfuCjB/aiZ9OgceAlP9LE+vzFRsxpYyVSssNF77cogU2YZAXB MLCpS7qciDLjkOw/AenF =nUqA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z0eOaCaDLjvTGF2l--