From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c / ACPI: Do not touch an I2C device if it belongs to another adapter
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:59:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922085924.GB1433@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160922084930.GI1218@lahna.fi.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 431 bytes --]
> > Huh? It doesn't apply on top of rc7 here? What did you base it on?
>
> It is based on linux-next as it is on top of Jarkko's I2C ACPI namespace
> cleanup patches. I'm wondering if I make an updated patch on top of
> v4.8-rc7 does it conflict with the I2C stuff in linux-next? What's your
> preference?
I see. I'll add it to for-next, then. If someone wants it backported, it
needs to be rewritten and re-tested.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-22 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87a8f4kfhe.fsf@gmail.com>
2016-09-19 8:48 ` [REGRESSION? v4.8] i2c-core: acpi_i2c_get_info() touches non-existent devices Mika Westerberg
2016-09-19 13:03 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-19 13:58 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-09-20 7:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 8:00 ` [PATCH] i2c / ACPI: Do not touch an I2C device if it belongs to another adapter Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 10:32 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-09-20 10:45 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 13:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 18:49 ` Nicolai Stange
2016-09-21 5:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-09-21 8:45 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-21 16:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-09-22 8:49 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-22 8:59 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2016-09-22 9:25 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-22 17:46 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160922085924.GB1433@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).