From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.9 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 22:37:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20161007203753.GA1429@katana> References: <20161007093226.GA2058@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Return-path: Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:57060 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932765AbcJGUiA (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 16:38:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: linux-i2c , LKML --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > I see you didn't pick up the follow-up patch ("gpio: pca953x: add a > comment explaining the need for a lockdep subclass"). Linus acked it This was planned for the following pull request. Didn't want to change what was successfully in linux-next for a while. --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX+AegAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2b6sQAKRqB1dD5Kx6w0BVNFutvY0y 9RIt7vw9Si4Ra8onPbYFSyqvkfT59k4/ox9dKN/SFubQ2e8VByOT//g0lbre9mUe kwD3p2/+1z3Yl5ImvuCcd6fcdvMxqlRNylcmfw9SL7/+Oz3UmEiMUs3BkMZzyzEo iQybK9AIhjhrv0DxsH8DYpycqTWta1SRoyG10CR8172wKBXbwEOHRcy9Sosxf3uw NYKpK4TMIxkdXwr5ZWnyFSy22mp9hN/rv1jGawBPP5nq3jBaiQcUCUAELV6WwOjl ZULRLtt4a3njvf73SFigroFMK7Wg7CGFa9O97MvSpx9SmlonlKkdrl5h5uSgsfJj YhR8Xl1nTy8AtThO9FXa2aAty7mQiSwMYKZPU7yaM/vjTt+TGbh3OJF+42Ed38cu F8CKEoZlkun26X5xT1dnRvRjxcF6EdbuaffUknDHA4OlaWUKMF33JonWfYH4z6M8 Wdj0H8etKXtffRBCDE7sLmEc+XbeYXwxA5v8zRAOJFoin0whK3lfUzg6on79eZxo egL28LTN45c+vKdDEcMVuiIGnlTejQ/S6Bea2ttqXq5pMN1WNzbQcn0MgQZcwi1y XFeCYQ0Q3KHIZSEtMLRuHotbsqidwLB8/mvBXn3kl/c1kiFylXrv5b9ipcTFmlhU 5QcqyCW7mm4TRTSBkH4n =O591 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99--