From: Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Peter Swain <pswain@cavium.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: Fix waiting for operation completion
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:20:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108092017.GC5675@hardcore> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161107200921.30284-2-paul.burton@imgtec.com>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:09:21PM +0000, Paul Burton wrote:
> Commit 1bb1ff3e7c74 ("i2c: octeon: Improve performance if interrupt is
> early") modified octeon_i2c_wait() & octeon_i2c_hlc_wait() to attempt to
> check for a valid bit being clear & if not to sleep for a while then try
> again before waiting on a waitqueue which may time out. However it does
> so by sleeping within a function called as the condition provided to
> wait_event_timeout() which seems to cause strange behaviour, with the
> system hanging during boot with the condition being checked constantly &
> the timeout not seeming to have any effect.
>
> Fix this by instead checking for the valid bit being clear in the
> octeon_i2c(_hlc)_wait() functions & sleeping there if that condition is
> not met, then calling the wait_event_timeout with a condition that does
> not sleep.
>
> Tested on a Rhino Labs UTM-8 with Octeon CN7130.
This patch breaks ipmi on ThunderX (CN88xx). We also have not seen the
problems you mention, although I must admit that I don't like the
complicated nested waits.
--Jan
> Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
> Cc: Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com>
> Cc: Peter Swain <pswain@cavium.com>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c | 58 ++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c
> index 419b54b..2e270a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c
> @@ -36,24 +36,6 @@ static bool octeon_i2c_test_iflg(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
> return (octeon_i2c_ctl_read(i2c) & TWSI_CTL_IFLG);
> }
>
> -static bool octeon_i2c_test_ready(struct octeon_i2c *i2c, bool *first)
> -{
> - if (octeon_i2c_test_iflg(i2c))
> - return true;
> -
> - if (*first) {
> - *first = false;
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * IRQ has signaled an event but IFLG hasn't changed.
> - * Sleep and retry once.
> - */
> - usleep_range(I2C_OCTEON_EVENT_WAIT, 2 * I2C_OCTEON_EVENT_WAIT);
> - return octeon_i2c_test_iflg(i2c);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * octeon_i2c_wait - wait for the IFLG to be set
> * @i2c: The struct octeon_i2c
> @@ -80,8 +62,13 @@ static int octeon_i2c_wait(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
> }
>
> i2c->int_enable(i2c);
> - time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->queue, octeon_i2c_test_ready(i2c, &first),
> - i2c->adap.timeout);
> + time_left = i2c->adap.timeout;
> + if (!octeon_i2c_test_iflg(i2c)) {
> + usleep_range(I2C_OCTEON_EVENT_WAIT, 2 * I2C_OCTEON_EVENT_WAIT);
> + time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->queue,
> + octeon_i2c_test_iflg(i2c),
> + time_left);
> + }
> i2c->int_disable(i2c);
>
> if (i2c->broken_irq_check && !time_left &&
> @@ -99,26 +86,8 @@ static int octeon_i2c_wait(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
>
> static bool octeon_i2c_hlc_test_valid(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
> {
> - return (__raw_readq(i2c->twsi_base + SW_TWSI(i2c)) & SW_TWSI_V) == 0;
> -}
> -
> -static bool octeon_i2c_hlc_test_ready(struct octeon_i2c *i2c, bool *first)
> -{
> /* check if valid bit is cleared */
> - if (octeon_i2c_hlc_test_valid(i2c))
> - return true;
> -
> - if (*first) {
> - *first = false;
> - return false;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * IRQ has signaled an event but valid bit isn't cleared.
> - * Sleep and retry once.
> - */
> - usleep_range(I2C_OCTEON_EVENT_WAIT, 2 * I2C_OCTEON_EVENT_WAIT);
> - return octeon_i2c_hlc_test_valid(i2c);
> + return (__raw_readq(i2c->twsi_base + SW_TWSI(i2c)) & SW_TWSI_V) == 0;
> }
>
> static void octeon_i2c_hlc_int_clear(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
> @@ -176,7 +145,6 @@ static void octeon_i2c_hlc_disable(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
> */
> static int octeon_i2c_hlc_wait(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
> {
> - bool first = true;
> int time_left;
>
> /*
> @@ -194,9 +162,13 @@ static int octeon_i2c_hlc_wait(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
> }
>
> i2c->hlc_int_enable(i2c);
> - time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->queue,
> - octeon_i2c_hlc_test_ready(i2c, &first),
> - i2c->adap.timeout);
> + time_left = i2c->adap.timeout;
> + if (!octeon_i2c_hlc_test_valid(i2c)) {
> + usleep_range(I2C_OCTEON_EVENT_WAIT, 2 * I2C_OCTEON_EVENT_WAIT);
> + time_left = wait_event_timeout(i2c->queue,
> + octeon_i2c_hlc_test_valid(i2c),
> + time_left);
> + }
> i2c->hlc_int_disable(i2c);
> if (!time_left)
> octeon_i2c_hlc_int_clear(i2c);
> --
> 2.10.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-07 20:09 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: octeon: Fix register access Paul Burton
2016-11-07 20:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: octeon: Fix waiting for operation completion Paul Burton
2016-11-08 9:20 ` Jan Glauber [this message]
2016-11-09 13:41 ` Jan Glauber
2016-11-09 14:07 ` Paul Burton
2016-11-09 14:38 ` Jan Glauber
2016-11-11 8:57 ` Jan Glauber
2016-11-11 20:51 ` Steven J. Hill
2016-11-11 22:11 ` David Daney
2016-11-08 7:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: octeon: Fix register access Jan Glauber
2016-11-09 14:09 ` Paul Burton
2016-11-09 14:43 ` Jan Glauber
2016-11-10 20:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-11-11 7:00 ` Jan Glauber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161108092017.GC5675@hardcore \
--to=jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=pswain@cavium.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).