From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Glauber Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] i2c: octeon: thunderx: Limit register access retries Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:07:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20161212160711.GA2766@hardcore> References: <20161209093158.3161-1-jglauber@cavium.com> <20161209093158.3161-4-jglauber@cavium.com> <20161211220148.GG2552@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161211220148.GG2552@katana> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Wolfram Sang , Paul Burton , "Steven J . Hill" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, David Daney List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:01:48PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:31:57AM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote: > > Do not infinitely retry register readq and writeq operations > > in order to not lock up the CPU in case the TWSI gets stuck. > > > > Return -EIO in case of a failed data read. For all other > > cases just return so subsequent operations will fail > > and trigger the recovery. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber > > I can't apply this one? > Strange. Applies for me on top of 4.9 and also next-20161212. I can also apply if back from the mail. Is the mail messed up on your side?