From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
"russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" <russianneuromancer@ya.ru>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/i915: Acquire P-Unit access when modifying P-Unit settings
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:10:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170130131041.GM31595@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2eea197f-2485-5f93-1691-42a9a2e11267@redhat.com>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 06:18:45PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/28/2017 05:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 01/27/2017 02:51 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:09:58PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>> Make sure the P-Unit or the PMIC i2c bus is not in use when we send a
> >>> request to the P-Unit by calling iosf_mbi_punit_acquire() / _release()
> >>> around P-Unit write accesses.
> >>
> >> Can't we just stuff the calls into the actual punit write function
> >> rather than sprinkling them all over the place?
> >
> > punit access is acquired across sections like this:
> >
> > iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >
> > val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> > val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK;
> > val |= (cmd << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT);
> > vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ, val);
> > if (wait_for((vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ) &
> > DSPFREQSTAT_MASK) == (cmd << DSPFREQSTAT_SHIFT),
> > 50)) {
> > DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
> > }
> > iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >
> > Where we want to wait for the requested change to have taken
> > effect before releasing the punit.
Hmm. That's somewhat unfortunate. It also highlights a problem with the
patch wrt. RPS. We don't wait for the GPU to actually change frequencies
in set_rps() because that would slow things down too much. So I have to
wonder how much luck is needed to make this workaround really effective.
> >
> >>
> >> + a comment would be nice why it's there.
> >
> > I will add comments to the acquire calls.
> >
> >> Do we need a kconfig select/depends on the iosf_mbi thing? Or some
> >> ifdefs?
> >
> > No, the iosf_mbi header defines empty inline versions of
> > iosf_mbi_punit_acquire / _release if IOSF_MBI is disabled,
> > this does mean that iosf_mbi must be builtin if the i915
> > driver is. I'll add:
> >
> > depends on DRM_I915=IOSF_MBI || IOSF_MBI=y
> >
> > To the i915 Kconfig to enforce this.
>
> Hmm, ok so that does not work (long cyclic dependency through the
> selection of ACPI_VIDEO).
>
> So I've now added this instead:
>
> # iosf_mbi needs to be builtin if we are builtin
> select IOSF_MBI if DRM_I915=y
That's probably not going to help anyone since i915 is usually a module.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
> >>> BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155241
> >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >>> Tested-by: tagorereddy <tagore.chandan@gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> -Spelling: P-Unit, PMIC
> >>> -Adjust for iosf_mbi_punit_lock/_unlock to _acquire/_release rename
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 ++++++
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 9 +++++++++
> >>> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> index 5604701..13e5152 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> >>> #include <drm/drm_rect.h>
> >>> #include <linux/dma_remapping.h>
> >>> #include <linux/reservation.h>
> >>> +#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
> >>>
> >>> static bool is_mmio_work(struct intel_flip_work *work)
> >>> {
> >>> @@ -6421,6 +6422,8 @@ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>> cmd = 0;
> >>>
> >>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>> +
> >>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>> val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK;
> >>> val |= (cmd << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT);
> >>> @@ -6430,6 +6433,7 @@ static void valleyview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>> 50)) {
> >>> DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
> >>> }
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>
> >>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);
> >>> @@ -6497,6 +6501,7 @@ static void cherryview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>> cmd = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(dev_priv->hpll_freq << 1, cdclk) - 1;
> >>>
> >>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>> val &= ~DSPFREQGUAR_MASK_CHV;
> >>> val |= (cmd << DSPFREQGUAR_SHIFT_CHV);
> >>> @@ -6506,6 +6511,7 @@ static void cherryview_set_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev, int cdclk)
> >>> 50)) {
> >>> DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for CDclk change\n");
> >>> }
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>>
> >>> intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >>> index 249623d..adff84a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >>> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> >>> #include "../../../platform/x86/intel_ips.h"
> >>> #include <linux/module.h>
> >>> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
> >>> +#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
> >>>
> >>> /**
> >>> * DOC: RC6
> >>> @@ -276,6 +277,7 @@ static void chv_set_memory_dvfs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
> >>> u32 val;
> >>>
> >>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>
> >>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DDR_SETUP2);
> >>> if (enable)
> >>> @@ -290,6 +292,7 @@ static void chv_set_memory_dvfs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
> >>> FORCE_DDR_FREQ_REQ_ACK) == 0, 3))
> >>> DRM_ERROR("timed out waiting for Punit DDR DVFS request\n");
> >>>
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -298,6 +301,7 @@ static void chv_set_memory_pm5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
> >>> u32 val;
> >>>
> >>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>
> >>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>> if (enable)
> >>> @@ -306,6 +310,7 @@ static void chv_set_memory_pm5(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool enable)
> >>> val &= ~DSP_MAXFIFO_PM5_ENABLE;
> >>> vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ, val);
> >>>
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -4553,6 +4558,7 @@ void vlv_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>>
> >>> if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
> >>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>>
> >>> val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>> if (val & DSP_MAXFIFO_PM5_ENABLE)
> >>> @@ -4582,6 +4588,7 @@ void vlv_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
> >>> wm->level = VLV_WM_LEVEL_DDR_DVFS;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -4988,7 +4995,9 @@ static void valleyview_set_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
> >>> I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, gen6_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, val));
> >>>
> >>> if (val != dev_priv->rps.cur_freq) {
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>> vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_REQ, val);
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>> if (!IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
> >>> gen6_set_rps_thresholds(dev_priv, val);
> >>> }
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> >>> index c0b7e95..e66bcc8 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> >>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> >>>
> >>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >>> #include <linux/vgaarb.h>
> >>> +#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
> >>>
> >>> #include "i915_drv.h"
> >>> #include "intel_drv.h"
> >>> @@ -1027,6 +1028,8 @@ static void vlv_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>> if (COND)
> >>> goto out;
> >>>
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>> +
> >>> ctrl = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_CTRL);
> >>> ctrl &= ~mask;
> >>> ctrl |= state;
> >>> @@ -1037,6 +1040,8 @@ static void vlv_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>> state,
> >>> vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_CTRL));
> >>>
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>> +
> >>> #undef COND
> >>>
> >>> out:
> >>> @@ -1643,6 +1648,8 @@ static void chv_set_pipe_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>> if (COND)
> >>> goto out;
> >>>
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_acquire();
> >>> +
> >>> ctrl = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ);
> >>> ctrl &= ~DP_SSC_MASK(pipe);
> >>> ctrl |= enable ? DP_SSC_PWR_ON(pipe) : DP_SSC_PWR_GATE(pipe);
> >>> @@ -1653,6 +1660,8 @@ static void chv_set_pipe_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >>> state,
> >>> vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_DSPFREQ));
> >>>
> >>> + iosf_mbi_punit_release();
> >>> +
> >>> #undef COND
> >>>
> >>> out:
> >>> --
> >>> 2.9.3
> >>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-30 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 21:09 [PATCH v2 00/13] coordinate cht i2c-pmic and i915-punit accesses Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a mutex for P-Unit access Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi: Add a PMIC bus access notifier Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] i2c: designware: Rename accessor_flags to flags Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] i2c: designware-baytrail: Pass dw_i2c_dev into helper functions Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] i2c: designware-baytrail: Only check iosf_mbi_available() for shared hosts Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] i2c: designware-baytrail: Disallow the CPU to enter C6 or C7 while holding the punit semaphore Hans de Goede
2017-01-24 9:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-24 16:48 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] i2c: designware-baytrail: Fix race when resetting the semaphore Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] i2c: designware-baytrail: Add support for cherrytrail Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] i2c: designware-baytrail: Acquire P-Unit access on bus acquire Hans de Goede
2017-01-27 11:29 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] i2c: designware-baytrail: Call pmic_bus_access_notifier_chain Hans de Goede
2017-01-27 11:35 ` Jarkko Nikula
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] drm/i915: Add intel_uncore_suspend / resume functions Hans de Goede
2017-01-27 13:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-01-28 16:05 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] drm/i915: Listen for PMIC bus access notifications Hans de Goede
2017-01-27 13:52 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-01-28 17:39 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-23 21:09 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] drm/i915: Acquire P-Unit access when modifying P-Unit settings Hans de Goede
2017-01-27 13:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-01-28 16:25 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-28 17:18 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-30 13:10 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-01-30 15:02 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-30 15:11 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-01-30 15:27 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-30 15:38 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-01-30 16:33 ` Hans de Goede
2017-02-10 10:19 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-25 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] coordinate cht i2c-pmic and i915-punit accesses Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170130131041.GM31595@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=russianneuromancer@ya.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).