From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Christian Fetzer <fetzer.ch@gmail.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
853122@bugs.debian.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Tim Small <tim@seoss.co.uk>,
Nehal Shah <nehal-bakulchandra.shah@amd.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Brandon <tbrandonau@gmail.com>,
Eddi De Pieri <eddi@depieri.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] Changes to i2c-piix4.c initialisation prevent loading of sp5100_tco watchdog driver on AMD SB800 chipset
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 11:17:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170303101702.GA1669@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488530782.2457.41.camel@users.sourceforge.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1670 bytes --]
> Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
> multiplexed main adapter in SB800) [1] caused a regression. Tim
> reported that to the Linux Kernel Bugtracker as bug #170741 last
> September [2], but it looks like the affected subsystems don’t use it.
Jean Delvare pointed out this issue amongst others[1] last year already.
Let me quote:
===
5* The I/O ports used for SMBus configuration and port switching are
also needed by a watchdog driver, sp5100_tco. Both drivers request the
region, so the first one wins, and the other driver can't be loaded.
sp5100_tco was there first, so the changes done to the i2c-piix4 driver
recently will cause a regression for some users by preventing them
from using the sp5100_tco and i2c-piix4 drivers at the same time. In
the long run I guess we will need a helper module to handle this shared
resource. Unless IORESOURCE_MUXED can be used for that. Either way,
that's more work than I can put into this before kernel v4.5 is
released. For the time being, I think we should simply make it
non-fatal if the I/O ports can't be requested, and continue without
multiplexing (as before.)
===
Seems nobody had the resources, so far. I don't have the HW and not much
experience with non-embedded platforms. I wonder, though, if we really
need to convert the drivers to MFD ones, or if we could use the simpler
MFD_SYSCON mechanism which helps in exactly such cases for embedded
platforms. But I am really lacking details here and am afraid this is
probably all the input I can give currently.
Regards,
Wolfram
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg23437.html
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1485728348.3220.10.camel@googlemail.com>
2017-03-03 8:46 ` Bug#853122: [Regression] Changes to i2c-piix4.c initialisation prevent loading of sp5100_tco watchdog driver on AMD SB800 chipset Paul Menzel
2017-03-03 10:17 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-03-31 7:17 ` Paul Menzel
2017-03-31 12:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-03-31 14:46 ` Bug#853122: " Boszormenyi Zoltan
2017-03-31 15:05 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20170331150524.GA31555-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-01 10:13 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
[not found] ` <efce69fc-3899-43f4-c8ee-12b78a571e5a-v1d7l9VOqKc@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-01 13:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-04-01 16:20 ` Bug#853122: " Boszormenyi Zoltan
2017-04-01 16:31 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
2017-04-03 6:34 ` Paul Menzel
2017-04-03 7:59 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
[not found] ` <b42d979b-9172-48ba-dba9-a67d9a143bca-v1d7l9VOqKc@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-27 11:52 ` Boszormenyi Zoltan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170303101702.GA1669@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=853122@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eddi@depieri.net \
--cc=fetzer.ch@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nehal-bakulchandra.shah@amd.com \
--cc=paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tbrandonau@gmail.com \
--cc=tim@seoss.co.uk \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).