From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:09:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20170330080926.GA21926@kroah.com> References: <1490624525-15865-1-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Rosin Cc: Wolfram Sang , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Jonathan Corbet , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Colin Ian King , Paul Gortmaker List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:34:52AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-03-27 16:21, Peter Rosin wrote: > > Hi Greg! > > > > Please apply. > > > > *snip snip* > > > v10 -> v11 changes > > - added a new patch (12) with a fix for messed up error path reported > > by Paul Gortmaker. > > Oops, should be Dan Carpenter. Sorry about that... > > And, I forgot to high-light this: > > > v4 -> v5 changes > > - driver for Analog Devices ADG792A/G, literally the first mux chip > > I found on the Internet with an i2c interface (that was not a > > dedicated i2c multiplexer like PCA9547) which I used to verify > > that the abstractions in the mux core are up to the task. Untested, > > just proof of concept that at least looks pretty and compiles... > > Maybe the patches related to adg792 (last two patches in v12) should > not be applied? I don't care much either way, your call Greg... Give me a chance to catch up on reviews, your patch series is behind 400+ other emails... greg k-h