linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] i2c-stub: make it usable with DT when booting
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 10:52:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170518105253.058a90a6@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170516112758.2842-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Hi Wolfram,

On Tue, 16 May 2017 13:27:58 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> This patch makes the stub driver parse the device tree when booting and
> create a virtual bus with the desired devices attached. Here is an
> example DTS snipplet making use of it. It is for simulating a more
> complex camera device which has dependencies which needs to be sorted
> out at boot time:
> 
> i2c@42 {
> 	compatible = "i2c-stub";
> 
> 	#address-cells = <1>;
> 	#size-cells = <0>;
> 
> 	des@4c {
> 		compatible = "maxim,max9268";
> 		reg = <0x4c>;
> 	};
> 
> 	eeprom@57 {
> 		compatible = "atmel,24c02";
> 		reg = <0x57>;
> 	};
> };

I get the idea and I understand the need to emulate the devices early
in the boot process. However, how do you deal with the I2C devices
pre-initialization (setting initial register values)? This is typically
done in user-space with the i2c-stub-from-dump script, or manual calls
to i2cset, but that would be too late in your case, wouldn't it?

> 
> FIXME: can fw_* calls be used instead of of_*?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> 
> It was really useful when developing. When using fw_* calls, we probably could
> make use of it with ACPI as well. Still, calling for opinions if we want this
> upstream or if we want to stay module-only? Also, the binding should really
> be marked as "development only". Or is it better to keep it as a separate
> patch to keep the binding un-official?

Code looks sane, but I can't comment on the bindings side of things as
this isn't my area.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-18  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-16 11:27 [RFC] i2c-stub: make it usable with DT when booting Wolfram Sang
2017-05-18  8:52 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2017-05-18  9:30   ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170518105253.058a90a6@endymion \
    --to=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).