From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: xgene-slimpro: include linux/io.h for memremap Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 15:02:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20170618130223.p2nysktwi3fqlvj2@ninjato> References: <20170609102937.3054567-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20170615135740.fa2g5wbdwx7psn2w@ninjato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ipm45dis365u752j" Return-path: Received: from sauhun.de ([88.99.104.3]:48981 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752364AbdFRNCZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jun 2017 09:02:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170615135740.fa2g5wbdwx7psn2w@ninjato> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Hoan Tran , Ludovic Desroches , Tin Huynh , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ipm45dis365u752j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:57:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 12:29:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The newly added support for the pcc mailbox fails to build > > in some configurations: > >=20 > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xgene-slimpro.c: In function 'xgene_slimpro_i2c_= probe': > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xgene-slimpro.c:516:25: error: implicit declarat= ion of function 'memremap'; did you mean 'memcmp'? [-Werror=3Dimplicit-func= tion-declaration] > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xgene-slimpro.c:518:13: error: 'MEMREMAP_WB' und= eclared (first use in this function) > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-xgene-slimpro.c:518:13: note: each undeclared id= entifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > >=20 > > This includes the missing header file. > >=20 > > Fixes: df5da47fe722 ("i2c: xgene-slimpro: Add ACPI support by using PCC= mailbox") > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >=20 > Applied to for-current, thanks! Oops, the offending commit is only in for-next. So, reconsidered and moved this patch to for-next as well. Regards, Wolfram --ipm45dis365u752j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAllGed8ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZMkg/+N02fw3h1PkJK+VPRi1DhJ+Z28i3FibbyNq2NLNrQ0piZpn/Lpb7wB6ON D0zcI9soNaAp8yTvTIj4FSkGpHepYliz0j5R+J8+ghPk4WhZFTQ/Uqq0hLt3grWM 8k7NiknCt8m5dlEgHVM2/YTLSZkraNXs+6NaJagzkTjg5bFGaB29R07IdpvRtl+a nHUynwhMKuw/KKQctgVssUs2L3Yf08opn61fgfioOdM0D1FvzmMUyt5CLqJDtDcR Fq3dlFaKMOtRNpygNJhhlMHRwkL74MdF6QtOxLiJjPAsi3G6gV/xIbQOuTL2OMaC 59YLK7zC4ZBi78q4EjnLIoVpT/8j4pw3g3dwLI2otdCBZWg1MRKA8SNjMdJH+Vf4 D9ZD+vrKb4PtbAjqTpxE4SUp8IVmmLn80BCfeFMrDGMg3csXut43CvbjBWkedBbp eRVD3h4oLg03yg3og/x5NjBwypW0QfuUSBkxjRn0moo0jtBJeBAxb1q4ZDroQMAI oDdcV8cU0Wk0VHLCuNRPmT8SUR9nlfrWRBWP403Oj49k5TwCJCWY+85DNEIzL13D pnbEMIXuXDs8EvGo9+caBB4YKbFvyUWuGY83J7HlWY7g7o2y9qurk4dB+Ktuec7+ 9j3wnI8JPVqFCKUh0AqACpiVoEKPXj/4xfr1K0TpkJO+dgdngSU= =NPcR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ipm45dis365u752j--