linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <btissoir@redhat.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict harder
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 13:15:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170812111507.rxc7lzc6f7uoqlt2@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170626204009.32607-1-lyude@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5342 bytes --]


On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:40:08PM -0400, Lyude wrote:
> There's quite a number of machines on the market, mainly Lenovo
> ThinkPads, that make the horrible mistake in their firmware of reusing
> the PCIBAR space reserved for the SMBus for things that are completely
> unrelated to the SMBus controller, such as the OpRegion used for i915.
> This is very bad and entirely evil, but with Lenovo's historically poor
> track record of fixing their firmware, it is extremely unlikely this is
> ever going to be properly fixed.
> 
> So, while it would be nice if we could just cut off the SMBus controller
> and call it a day this unfortunately breaks RMI4 mode completely for
> most of the ThinkPads. Even though this behavior is extremely wrong, for
> whatever reason sharing the PCIBAR between the OpRegion and SMBus seems
> to be just fine. Regardless however, I think it's safe to assume that
> when the BIOS accesses the PCIBAR space of the SMBus controller like
> this that it's trying to get to something else that we mapped the SMBus
> controller over.
> 
> On my X1 Carbon, this assumption appears to be correct. I've traced down
> the firmware accesses to being caused by the firmware mistakenly placing
> the SWSCI mailbox for i915 on top of the SMBus host controller region.
> And indeed, blacklisting i915 causes the firmware to never attempt to
> touch this region.
> 
> So, in order to try to workaround this and not break either SMBus or
> i915, we temporarily unmap the PCI device for the SMBus controller,
> do the thing that the firmware wanted to do, then remap the device and
> report a firmware bug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>

No full name? Or is it your full name?

> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <btissoir@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

I don't know this matter at all. I'd need comments from these people on
CC to proceed with this one.

> ---
> So: unfortunately
> 
> a7ae81952cda (i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict with PCI BAR)
> 
> Seems to prevent the ThinkPad X1 Carbon 4th gen and the T460s from actually
> using their SMBus controllers at all. As mentioned above, I've traced the issue
> down to the firmware responding to the SWSCI by sticking data in places it
> shouldn't, e.g. the SMBus registers.
> 
> I'm entirely unsure if this patch is the correct fix for this, and wouldn't be
> at all surprised if it's just as bad of a patch as I think it is ;P. So I
> figured I'd send it to intel-gfx and the authors of the original version of this
> patch to get their take on it and see if there might be something less hacky we
> can do to fix this.
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> index 6484fa6..bfbe0f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> @@ -1406,33 +1406,42 @@ i801_acpi_io_handler(u32 function, acpi_physical_address address, u32 bits,
>  {
>  	struct i801_priv *priv = handler_context;
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = priv->pci_dev;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	acpi_status status;
> +	int err;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Once BIOS AML code touches the OpRegion we warn and inhibit any
> -	 * further access from the driver itself. This device is now owned
> -	 * by the system firmware.
> -	 */
>  	mutex_lock(&priv->acpi_lock);
>  
> -	if (!priv->acpi_reserved) {
> -		priv->acpi_reserved = true;
> +	/*
> +	 * BIOS AML code should never actually touch the SMBus registers,
> +	 * however crappy firmware (mainly Lenovo's) can make the mistake of
> +	 * mapping things over the SMBus region that should definitely not be
> +	 * there (such as the OpRegion for Intel GPUs).
> +	 * This is extremely bad firmware behavior, but it is unlikely this will
> +	 * ever get fixed by Lenovo.
> +	 */
> +	dev_warn_once(dev,
> +		      FW_BUG "OpRegion overlaps with SMBus registers, working around\n");
>  
> -		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "BIOS is accessing SMBus registers\n");
> -		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Driver SMBus register access inhibited\n");
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * BIOS is accessing the host controller so prevent it from
> -		 * suspending automatically from now on.
> -		 */
> -		pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> -	}
> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> +	pcim_iounmap_regions(pdev, 1 << SMBBAR);
>  
>  	if ((function & ACPI_IO_MASK) == ACPI_READ)
>  		status = acpi_os_read_port(address, (u32 *)value, bits);
>  	else
>  		status = acpi_os_write_port(address, (u32)*value, bits);
>  
> +	err = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << SMBBAR,
> +				 dev_driver_string(&pdev->dev));
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +			FW_BUG "Failed to restore SMBus region 0x%lx-0x%Lx. SMBus is now broken.\n",
> +			priv->smba,
> +			(unsigned long long)pci_resource_end(pdev, SMBBAR));
> +		priv->acpi_reserved = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	pm_runtime_put(dev);
>  	mutex_unlock(&priv->acpi_lock);
>  
>  	return status;
> -- 
> 2.9.4
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-12 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-26 20:40 [PATCH] i2c: i801: Allow ACPI SystemIO OpRegion to conflict harder Lyude
2017-06-26 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-06-30 10:56 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-07-03 12:23 ` David Weinehall
2017-08-12 11:15 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-08-14 16:06   ` Lyude Paul
2017-08-17 19:48     ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170812111507.rxc7lzc6f7uoqlt2@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=btissoir@redhat.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).