From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: pca-platform: additional improvements Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 18:29:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20171029172918.2xtz2srh2meq45io@ninjato> References: <20170705101358.17458-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="someicsnm7yinxah" Return-path: Received: from sauhun.de ([88.99.104.3]:43141 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751621AbdJ2R3W (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Oct 2017 13:29:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170705101358.17458-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Packham Cc: ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --someicsnm7yinxah Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 10:13:54PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > This series addresses some of the points identified by Andy. The series is > based on top of i2c/for-next. 2 of the patches from v1 have already been > applied so I've dropped them from this version. >=20 > I have compile tested patch 1/1 but I don't have access to sh hardware > to actually test the changes on. >=20 > Chris Packham (4): > sh: sh7785lcr: add GPIO lookup table for i2c controller reset > i2c: pca-platform: unconditionally use devm_gpiod_get_optional > i2c: pca-platform: use device_property_read_u32 > i2c: pca-platform: drop gpio from platform data >=20 > arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/boards/acvilon.c | 1 - > arch/sh/boards/board-sh7785lcr.c | 11 +++++++++- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pca-platform.c | 34 +++++++++----------------= ------ > include/linux/i2c-pca-platform.h | 3 --- > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) Series looks good to me, too. I'd need ACKs from the SH maintainers, though. Technically, from Blackfin maintainers as well. But I haven't heard from them in months, so I could go without that. --someicsnm7yinxah Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAln2D+oACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbVNA/9FeZ+qC/dFF3NXE9GKxWrKm9kACxpfLTWFCCbmVl5wZIgBOqluP5dpozI Kl8FCX441SLXCZfm/onCbYFPu6YDuGC+envxRgQ/b51Z0wWFur31o/1EVf6bRHm0 h/Ot4FIPZBV0gzu6O567fqxnkYdc9nn1rOaE5J3/YewnbxAMJ+XzsLhGR5mZqBgU GOva4g4LkqYv2PYN6/RRTcL1haw1ZJ+5b/LpbkfLOoX8B8MOm3eoj9TBS7KCIlFq fpxYVGJX1QajunTXVzrDRHyMXbhpfvJucuRkxedoeQPykxKCXajNJuF0WtS00o58 lrsAfr09hSB2vJdgkRcCGHNzH12DaduVDkztyNC/5HALUhY2sInM/Hp7ZFtBrmR/ Wu8PMz2M8PStWaHY5Yy3+F9eH3Ay1XHXEsD1chCM6TdhBYEVc9leIGmWmDHbdsBB 0hXTD3r4ArNE/LEWhhbd8N6RP4lKWiFoEiYY19EAA5jDX5L06VJj7mO20pb+j2fz a7Agsp4Tvv6X+ScFXTELfnHjy8X4NxYsv74e/MfKFQhplxxAleoQWWWwwSVUMkYT IZkAYiaChGX5T1gLhL5Ew6cfhgHu25GUchKzPIOdh38xf5cgbC26hZ9Clvl5B++g HzkVU9x5VGZh592+IjjHhSuS5HM/eIVGLnM4mt2QFBcN/ibaG6g= =Zyt6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --someicsnm7yinxah--