From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-tools] i2c-dev.h: copy over typo fix from kernel include
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:37:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119093753.71e9457f@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115204030.26400-1-wsa@the-dreams.de>
Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 21:40:30 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We had a typo in a define which got fixed in the kernel. Fix it here,
> too!
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> ---
> include/linux/i2c-dev.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c-dev.h b/include/linux/i2c-dev.h
> index 839d25a..bbb50e8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/i2c-dev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c-dev.h
> @@ -66,7 +66,9 @@ struct i2c_rdwr_ioctl_data {
> __u32 nmsgs; /* number of i2c_msgs */
> };
>
> -#define I2C_RDRW_IOCTL_MAX_MSGS 42
> +#define I2C_RDWR_IOCTL_MAX_MSGS 42
> +/* Originally defined with a typo, keep it for compatibility */
> +#define I2C_RDRW_IOCTL_MAX_MSGS I2C_RDWR_IOCTL_MAX_MSGS
>
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_I2C_DEV_H */
Hmm, no. As part of the libi2c plan, we were supposed to get rid of
kernel header files duplication in i2c-tools. See commits 93caf007f4cb
("i2c-dev: Move SMBus helper functions to include/i2c/smbus.h") and
652619121974 ("i2c-dev.h: Minimize differences with kernel flavor".) At
this point i2c-tools' i2c-dev.h and the kernel's i2c-dev.h are exactly
the same file, modulo the difference you just pointed out.
So the right thing to do is to delete include/linux/i2c-dev.h from
i2c-tools altogether. We no longer use it and we no longer install it,
so it should be a straightforward change. I simply forgot to do it
after the library conversion.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-15 20:40 [PATCH i2c-tools] i2c-dev.h: copy over typo fix from kernel include Wolfram Sang
2018-01-19 8:37 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2018-01-19 9:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-01-23 13:34 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180119093753.71e9457f@endymion \
--to=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox