From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: synquacer: fix fence-post error in retry loop Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:41:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20180517134122.odweeppckmpckk4r@ninjato> References: <20180509194726.29166-1-peda@axentia.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lq7fi7y74l36e4nv" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180509194726.29166-1-peda@axentia.se> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Rosin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --lq7fi7y74l36e4nv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 09:47:26PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > There is a difference between attempts and retries. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin Applied to for-next, thanks! --lq7fi7y74l36e4nv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAlr9hoIACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZKOg//ZFmZcvLw/s44MmWQzjwxXeRqTdI2nBX6oIP2ROL9XoCr1BQyiTO9l7WF qVrujmaiBsKm9Hr0adbrP9dvurmbukcJSUL51gFSheSgtsYtS9PhwkEB8PCecRjE cu9lFnqUFQ09F03kG3LNKVckhX52PqgmsDU5tk4NT9QAqoyTJ0ff5ZPb83QTmt8Q rpaGe2ri8fZhHSBpCJvsbHQrMkG9WiTvRveDcftOg+9XYUs9POTiscQ82gssQqSA HQBMjFhM9TI/+JvCpzDk81WtZhOyFH50NfEuHnKlpPa4iJWCq742LIrIOPAjKReR Tp3HsROAtVgPtBU88r27ajbmGL70cgU96TJ5sIF5LPdahWh2EdzlJYkYxiXlu3nu 4B44YI+tK2jn0BgWRpdddPZttNnpz+gpPfsDSNRqVTVbTQm2a3LCt8FtJxpc/vSu 4lXn93KR4qHbiiqOLQUd7q3y2XPTQEALKXF799a5Lv6QjvHFuSKXwKSr9bOSgZyz g0UA8OuQgdiOBgrgLuTdEkBf0A3+J/Np9JNhoTmutl+kKrflFe7eCUpGyIw2elqK HVZxQY0I4JkkhbJ6cmgsceQwKnaCRp1rULsv3bkOkCt13+eDjaiFVAlqZ2d3Kq1s fCMI0nqvlF7lfHck/JM21d06934xTkbXx4ppZAGY6QXHnxjJR7o= =TnWa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lq7fi7y74l36e4nv--