From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] i2c: Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S900
 I2C driver
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2018 13:43:33 +0530
Message-ID: <20180701081333.GB28390@Mani-XPS-13-9360>
References: <20180630133330.23858-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <20180630133330.23858-6-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <CAHp75VcVNb51tJzKbCU3pqf0XYPCUZWpv38nfaV1711vyf2S0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcVNb51tJzKbCU3pqf0XYPCUZWpv38nfaV1711vyf2S0Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>,
 <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>, Mani Sadhasivam <manivannanece23@gmail.com>, hzhang@ucrobotics.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Thomas Liau <thomas.liau@actions-semi.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, 96boards@ucrobotics.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, amit.kucheria@linaro.org, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, jeff.chen@actions-semi.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>, =?utf-8?B?5YiY54Kc?= <liuwei@actions-semi.com>, bdong@ucrobotics.com, Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>, linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, mp-cs@actions-semi.com
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org

Hi Andy,

On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 12:11:00AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 4:33 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Add Actions Semiconductor Owl family S900 I2C driver.
> 
> Thanks for an update. Few left comments and it would LGTM.
> 

Thanks :)

> > +static int owl_i2c_reset(struct owl_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > +{
> 
> > +       mdelay(1);
> 
> But now, since it's not used in atomic context, we may switch to
> usleep_range() / msleep() instead.
> 

okay, will use msleep()

> > +       owl_i2c_update_reg(i2c_dev->base + OWL_I2C_REG_CTL,
> > +                               OWL_I2C_CTL_EN, true);
> > +
> 
> > +       /* Wait 50ms for FIFO reset complete */
> > +       do {
> 
> > +               mdelay(1);
> 
> Especially in this case it's very important.
> 

Okay.

> > +       } while (timeout++ < OWL_I2C_MAX_RETRIES);
> 
> > +}
> 
> > +       val = (i2c_dev->clk_rate + i2c_dev->bus_freq * 16 - 1) /
> > +                               (i2c_dev->bus_freq * 16);
> 
> This is effectively DIV_ROUND_UP(->clk_rate, ->bus_freq * 16).
> 

Ack.

> > +       /*
> > +        * By default, 0 will be returned if interrupt occurred but no
> > +        * read or write happened. Else if msg_ptr equals to message length,
> > +        * message count will be returned.
> > +        */
> 
> > +       if (i2c_dev->msg_ptr == msg->len)
> > +               ret = num;
> 
> I dunno if
> 
> ret = ->msg_ptr == len ? num : 0;
> 
> would be slightly more explicit (yes, I aware about ret == 0).
> 
> Up to you to choose.
> 

As per Peter's comment, returning 0 will get changed to an error value.
Will use this pattern once we settle with a proper error value.

> > +       /* We support only frequencies of 100k and 400k for now */
> > +       if (i2c_dev->bus_freq != OWL_I2C_DEF_SPEED_HZ &&
> > +                       i2c_dev->bus_freq > OWL_I2C_MAX_SPEED_HZ) {
> 
> I think it should be != in the second case as well.
> 

yeah, agree. We don't support any other frequencies now.

Thanks,
Mani

> > +               dev_err(dev, "invalid clock-frequency %d\n", i2c_dev->bus_freq);
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko