From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/29] mtd: Add support for reading MTD devices via the nvmem API Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:20:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20180820202038.5d3dc195@bbrezillon> References: <20180810080526.27207-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180810080526.27207-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180817182720.6a6e5e8e@bbrezillon> <20180819133106.0420df5f@tock> <20180819184609.6dcdbb9a@bbrezillon> <5b8c30b8-41e1-d59e-542b-fef6c6469ff0@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5b8c30b8-41e1-d59e-542b-fef6c6469ff0@linaro.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Srinivas Kandagatla Cc: Alban , Bartosz Golaszewski , Jonathan Corbet , Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Richard Weinberger , Grygorii Strashko , "David S . Miller" , Naren , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Andrew Morton , Lukas Wunner , Dan Carpenter , Florian Fainelli List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:43:34 +0100 Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > > Overall am still not able to clear visualize on how MTD bindings with > nvmem cells would look in both partition and un-partition usecases? > An example DT would be nice here!! Something along those lines: mtdnode { nvmem-cells { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; cell@0 { reg = <0x0 0x14>; }; }; partitions { compatible = "fixed-partitions"; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; partition@0 { reg = <0x0 0x20000>; nvmem-cells { #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <1>; cell@0 { reg = <0x0 0x10>; }; }; }; }; };