From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/29] mtd: Add support for reading MTD devices via
 the nvmem API
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:56:39 +0200
Message-ID: <20180821115639.4894c1c9@bbrezillon>
References: <20180810080526.27207-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
        <20180810080526.27207-7-brgl@bgdev.pl>
        <20180817182720.6a6e5e8e@bbrezillon>
        <20180819133106.0420df5f@tock>
        <20180819184609.6dcdbb9a@bbrezillon>
        <5b8c30b8-41e1-d59e-542b-fef6c6469ff0@linaro.org>
        <20180820202038.5d3dc195@bbrezillon>
        <e0ec3194-fd3a-9b3d-fba8-f88447eb56e9@linaro.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <e0ec3194-fd3a-9b3d-fba8-f88447eb56e9@linaro.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Cc: Alban <albeu@free.fr>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Naren <naren.kernel@gmail.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.co>
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 10:50:07 +0100
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 20/08/18 19:20, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:43:34 +0100
> > Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> wrote:
> >   
> >>
> >> Overall am still not able to clear visualize on how MTD bindings with
> >> nvmem cells would look in both partition and un-partition usecases?
> >> An example DT would be nice here!!  
> > 
> > Something along those lines:
> >   
> This looks good to me.
> > 	mtdnode {
> > 		nvmem-cells {
> > 			#address-cells = <1>;
> > 			#size-cells = <1>;
> > 
> > 			cell@0 {
> > 				reg = <0x0 0x14>;
> > 			};
> > 		};
> > 
> > 		partitions {
> > 			compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> > 			#address-cells = <1>;
> > 			#size-cells = <1>;
> > 
> > 			partition@0 {
> > 				reg = <0x0 0x20000>;
> > 
> > 				nvmem-cells {
> > 					#address-cells = <1>;
> > 					#size-cells = <1>;
> > 
> > 					cell@0 {
> > 						reg = <0x0 0x10>;
> > 					};
> > 				};
> > 			};
> > 		};
> > 	}; >  
> 
> Just curious...Is there a reason why we can't do it like this?:
> Is this because of issue of #address-cells and #size-cells Or mtd 
> bindings always prefer subnodes?
> 
> 	mtdnode {
> 		reg = <0x0123000 0x40000>;
> 		#address-cells = <1>;
> 		#size-cells = <1>;
> 		cell@0 {
> 			compatible = "nvmem-cell";
> 			reg = <0x0 0x14>;
> 		};
> 
> 		partitions {
> 			compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> 			#address-cells = <1>;
> 			#size-cells = <1>;
> 
> 			partition@0 {
> 				reg = <0x0 0x20000>;
> 				cell@0 {
> 					compatible = "nvmem-cell";
> 					reg = <0x0 0x10>;
> 				};
> 			};
> 		};
> 	};

It's because partitions were initially directly defined under the mtd
node, so, if you have an old DT you might have something like:

	mtdnode {
		reg = <0x0123000 0x40000>;
		#address-cells = <1>;
		#size-cells = <1>;

		partition@0 {
			reg = <0x0 0x20000>;
			...
		};
		...
	};

If we use such a DT with this patch applied, the NVMEM framework will
consider MTD partitions as nvmem cells, which is not what we want.