From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
James Feist <james.feist@linux.intel.com>,
Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:37:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180911183734.GA21976@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823225731.19063-1-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 03:57:31PM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
> In most of cases, interrupt bits are set one by one but there are
> also a lot of other cases that Aspeed I2C IP sends multiple
> interrupt bits with combining master and slave events using a
> single interrupt call. It happens much more in multi-master
> environment than single-master. For an example, when master is
> waiting for a NORMAL_STOP interrupt in its MASTER_STOP state,
> SLAVE_MATCH and RX_DONE interrupts could come along with the
> NORMAL_STOP in case of an another master immediately sends data
> just after acquiring the bus. In this case, the NORMAL_STOP
> interrupt should be handled by master_irq and the SLAVE_MATCH and
> RX_DONE interrupts should be handled by slave_irq. This commit
> modifies irq hadling logic to handle the master/slave combined
> events properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
This patch causes a boot stall when booting witherspoon-bmc with
qemu v3.0, and all i2c device probes fail with error -110 (timeout).
Bisect log is attached for reference.
With the same kernel configuration (aspeed_g5_defconfig),
ast2500-evb and romulus-bmc are still able to boot.
palmetto-bmc with aspeed_g4_defconfig also appears to work.
Is this a problem with qemu ? Should I drop the qemu test
for witherspoon-bmc starting with the next kernel release ?
Thanks,
Guenter
---
# bad: [09c0888767529cdb382f34452819e42d1a66a114] Add linux-next specific files for 20180911
# good: [11da3a7f84f19c26da6f86af878298694ede0804] Linux 4.19-rc3
git bisect start 'HEAD' 'v4.19-rc3'
# bad: [a2ebc71cf97bed9b453318418e4a281434565e8b] Merge remote-tracking branch 'nfc-next/master'
git bisect bad a2ebc71cf97bed9b453318418e4a281434565e8b
# good: [6fde463b32bf4105c28c0a297a5b66aca5d6ecd4] Merge remote-tracking branch 's390/features'
git bisect good 6fde463b32bf4105c28c0a297a5b66aca5d6ecd4
# bad: [136fd6d530a3ae0dd003984f683345cfe88c01f3] Merge remote-tracking branch 'v4l-dvb/master'
git bisect bad 136fd6d530a3ae0dd003984f683345cfe88c01f3
# good: [c7ae95368af43c08f5f615b00f2f7bf2e9c45788] Merge remote-tracking branch 'v9fs/9p-next'
git bisect good c7ae95368af43c08f5f615b00f2f7bf2e9c45788
# good: [4c640c41381e47b328c6507bcf534812761256cd] Merge branch 'for-4.19/fixes' into for-next
git bisect good 4c640c41381e47b328c6507bcf534812761256cd
# good: [5bc91f70c5ecc2bc5967b98ce7fa4e55ad230d99] Merge remote-tracking branch 'hid/for-next'
git bisect good 5bc91f70c5ecc2bc5967b98ce7fa4e55ad230d99
# bad: [657b9d37406ed1625d469db0fd356e364dc75dd8] Merge remote-tracking branch 'hwmon-staging/hwmon-next'
git bisect bad 657b9d37406ed1625d469db0fd356e364dc75dd8
# bad: [fc9f90ddace238716cfcbd00d51428ee8baa12c7] Merge branch 'i2c/for-current' into i2c/for-next
git bisect bad fc9f90ddace238716cfcbd00d51428ee8baa12c7
# good: [34b7be301d4c5d85d1d093d2faf856f3d727416f] Merge branch 'i2c/for-current' into i2c/for-next
git bisect good 34b7be301d4c5d85d1d093d2faf856f3d727416f
# bad: [3e9efc3299dd78a0fa96515f0a453fab1ed4a1bd] i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly
git bisect bad 3e9efc3299dd78a0fa96515f0a453fab1ed4a1bd
# good: [fc66b39fe36acfd06f716e338de7cd8f9550fad2] i2c: mediatek: Use DMA safe buffers for i2c transactions
git bisect good fc66b39fe36acfd06f716e338de7cd8f9550fad2
# first bad commit: [3e9efc3299dd78a0fa96515f0a453fab1ed4a1bd] i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-11 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 22:57 [PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-06 17:26 ` Brendan Higgins
2018-09-06 17:32 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-06 18:08 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-09-06 18:33 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-06 18:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-09-11 18:37 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-09-11 18:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2018-09-11 20:30 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-11 20:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-11 22:18 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-11 22:24 ` [PATCH] Revert "i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly" Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-11 22:53 ` [PATCH i2c-next v6] i2c: aspeed: Handle master/slave combined irq events properly Joel Stanley
2018-09-11 23:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-11 23:58 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-12 1:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-12 16:54 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-12 19:58 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-12 20:10 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-12 20:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-12 22:31 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-12 23:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-13 5:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2018-09-13 13:33 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-13 15:48 ` Cédric Le Goater
2018-09-13 15:57 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-13 16:35 ` Cédric Le Goater
2018-09-14 3:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-14 5:38 ` Cédric Le Goater
2018-09-14 13:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-09-14 16:52 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-13 5:47 ` Cédric Le Goater
2018-09-13 16:31 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-13 16:51 ` Cédric Le Goater
2018-09-13 17:01 ` Jae Hyun Yoo
2018-09-12 5:57 ` Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180911183734.GA21976@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james.feist@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=vernon.mauery@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).