* [PATCH 0/2] at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()
@ 2019-05-19 20:40 Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-05-19 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] eeprom: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-05-19 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: at24: drop unnecessary label Bartosz Golaszewski
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2019-05-19 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-i2c; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
I see Linus pulled the new helper, so here's a patch using it in at24
and also a small code tweak for better readability.
Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
eeprom: at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()
eeprom: at24: drop unnecessary label
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 65 ++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] eeprom: at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()
2019-05-19 20:40 [PATCH 0/2] at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device() Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2019-05-19 20:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-05-19 20:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-05-19 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: at24: drop unnecessary label Bartosz Golaszewski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2019-05-19 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-i2c; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Now that it's upstream, use the resource managed version
of i2c_new_dummy().
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
index 63aa541c9608..9ea196f0749f 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -507,14 +507,6 @@ static const struct at24_chip_data *at24_get_chip_data(struct device *dev)
return cdata;
}
-static void at24_remove_dummy_clients(struct at24_data *at24)
-{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 1; i < at24->num_addresses; i++)
- i2c_unregister_device(at24->client[i].client);
-}
-
static int at24_make_dummy_client(struct at24_data *at24, unsigned int index,
struct regmap_config *regmap_config)
{
@@ -527,8 +519,8 @@ static int at24_make_dummy_client(struct at24_data *at24, unsigned int index,
dev = &base_client->dev;
addr = base_client->addr + index;
- dummy_client = i2c_new_dummy(base_client->adapter,
- base_client->addr + index);
+ dummy_client = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(dev, base_client->adapter,
+ base_client->addr + index);
if (!dummy_client) {
dev_err(dev, "address 0x%02x unavailable\n", addr);
return -EADDRINUSE;
@@ -693,10 +685,8 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
/* use dummy devices for multiple-address chips */
for (i = 1; i < num_addresses; i++) {
err = at24_make_dummy_client(at24, i, ®map_config);
- if (err) {
- at24_remove_dummy_clients(at24);
+ if (err)
return err;
- }
}
i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
@@ -713,7 +703,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
pm_runtime_idle(dev);
if (err) {
err = -ENODEV;
- goto err_clients;
+ goto err_runtime_pm;
}
nvmem_config.name = dev_name(dev);
@@ -733,7 +723,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
at24->nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(dev, &nvmem_config);
if (IS_ERR(at24->nvmem)) {
err = PTR_ERR(at24->nvmem);
- goto err_clients;
+ goto err_runtime_pm;
}
dev_info(dev, "%u byte %s EEPROM, %s, %u bytes/write\n",
@@ -742,8 +732,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
return 0;
-err_clients:
- at24_remove_dummy_clients(at24);
+err_runtime_pm:
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
return err;
@@ -751,11 +740,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
{
- struct at24_data *at24;
-
- at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
-
- at24_remove_dummy_clients(at24);
pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: at24: drop unnecessary label
2019-05-19 20:40 [PATCH 0/2] at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device() Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-05-19 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] eeprom: " Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2019-05-19 20:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2019-05-19 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-i2c; +Cc: Wolfram Sang, linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
If we move the nvmem registration above the pm enable calls and the
test read, we can drop the error label and make the code more readable
as there's now only a single place where we must call
pm_runtime_disable() in error path.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
index 9ea196f0749f..0bc0a45fb98e 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -689,23 +689,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
return err;
}
- i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
-
- /* enable runtime pm */
- pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
- pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-
- /*
- * Perform a one-byte test read to verify that the
- * chip is functional.
- */
- err = at24_read(at24, 0, &test_byte, 1);
- pm_runtime_idle(dev);
- if (err) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto err_runtime_pm;
- }
-
nvmem_config.name = dev_name(dev);
nvmem_config.dev = dev;
nvmem_config.read_only = !writable;
@@ -721,9 +704,24 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
nvmem_config.size = byte_len;
at24->nvmem = devm_nvmem_register(dev, &nvmem_config);
- if (IS_ERR(at24->nvmem)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(at24->nvmem);
- goto err_runtime_pm;
+ if (IS_ERR(at24->nvmem))
+ return PTR_ERR(at24->nvmem);
+
+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24);
+
+ /* enable runtime pm */
+ pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+ pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+
+ /*
+ * Perform a one-byte test read to verify that the
+ * chip is functional.
+ */
+ err = at24_read(at24, 0, &test_byte, 1);
+ pm_runtime_idle(dev);
+ if (err) {
+ pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+ return -ENODEV;
}
dev_info(dev, "%u byte %s EEPROM, %s, %u bytes/write\n",
@@ -731,11 +729,6 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
writable ? "writable" : "read-only", at24->write_max);
return 0;
-
-err_runtime_pm:
- pm_runtime_disable(dev);
-
- return err;
}
static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] eeprom: at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()
2019-05-19 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] eeprom: " Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2019-05-19 20:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-05-20 6:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2019-05-19 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartosz Golaszewski; +Cc: linux-i2c, linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 422 bytes --]
> Now that it's upstream, use the resource managed version
> of i2c_new_dummy().
That was fast :)
> - dummy_client = i2c_new_dummy(base_client->adapter,
> - base_client->addr + index);
> + dummy_client = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(dev, base_client->adapter,
> + base_client->addr + index);
> if (!dummy_client) {
Oh well, the confusion starts already :/ devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()
returns an ERR_PTR.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] eeprom: at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()
2019-05-19 20:52 ` Wolfram Sang
@ 2019-05-20 6:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2019-05-20 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, linux-i2c, LKML
niedz., 19 maj 2019 o 22:52 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> napisał(a):
>
>
> > Now that it's upstream, use the resource managed version
> > of i2c_new_dummy().
>
> That was fast :)
>
> > - dummy_client = i2c_new_dummy(base_client->adapter,
> > - base_client->addr + index);
> > + dummy_client = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(dev, base_client->adapter,
> > + base_client->addr + index);
> > if (!dummy_client) {
>
> Oh well, the confusion starts already :/ devm_i2c_new_dummy_device()
> returns an ERR_PTR.
>
Ugh, sorry for that, especially since I followed the discussion on
that series. :(
I should not be sending out patches late on Sundays I guess.
Bart
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-05-20 6:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-19 20:40 [PATCH 0/2] at24: use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device() Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-05-19 20:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] eeprom: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-05-19 20:52 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-05-20 6:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2019-05-19 20:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: at24: drop unnecessary label Bartosz Golaszewski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).