From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: Register optional lis3lv02d i2c device on Dell machines Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 12:00:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20190528120011.288189f9@endymion> References: <20180212153012.vffvjmz26ifyxbj5@pali> <20180213150004.5d2v7y7wwuure4io@pali> <20180213165023.xmzovx7fd3gdljxw@pali> <20180226203255.lnnzipipjz5l2itz@ninjato> <20190528111953.0e5415f4@endymion> <20190528094132.ytsittb5hcgthoy2@pali> <1559037015.6521.3.camel@suse.de> <20190528095402.hlnqfon6jk452one@pali> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190528095402.hlnqfon6jk452one@pali> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Pali =?UTF-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Cc: Wolfram Sang , Andy Shevchenko , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= , Steven Honeyman , Valdis Kletnieks , Jochen Eisinger , Gabriele Mazzotta , Andy Lutomirski , Mario Limonciello , Alex Hung , Takashi Iwai , linux-i2c , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Platform Driver List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 May 2019 11:54:02 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 28 May 2019 11:50:15 Jean Delvare wrote: > > OK, thanks for the explanation. But assuming that we now instantiate > > the lis2lv02d device from i2c-i801 for exactly all the same machines, > > can't we just *enable* the freefall misc device feature of lis2lv02d > > and kill the dell-smo8800 driver completely? Seems more simple to > > maintain going forward. > > I though about it and I already wrote that is it not practical. For ACPI > drivers there is easy way to get that interrupt number from ACPI tables. > From i2c-i801 PCI driver it is hard to get interrupt number for > particular ACPI device... > > That is way I preferred simple solution: ACPI driver for ACPI device and > i2c driver for i2c device. OK, fine with me then :-) -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support