From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] usb: dwc3: qcom: Add support for booting with ACPI
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 23:35:07 -0700
Message-ID: <20190605063507.GM22737@tuxbook-pro>
References: <20190604104455.8877-1-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <20190604104455.8877-6-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190604104455.8877-6-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: alokc@codeaurora.org, kramasub@codeaurora.org, andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, balbi@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jlhugo@gmail.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org

On Tue 04 Jun 03:44 PDT 2019, Lee Jones wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
[..]
> @@ -373,7 +416,7 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_clk_init(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom, int count)
>  
>  	qcom->num_clocks = count;
>  
> -	if (!count)
> +	if (!count || ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
>  		return 0;

Afaict you call this with count = of_count_phandle_with_args(), which
should be 0. But why not skip calling this at all?

>  
>  	qcom->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, qcom->num_clocks,
> @@ -409,12 +452,28 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_clk_init(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom, int count)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static const struct dwc3_acpi_pdata sdm845_acpi_pdata = {
> +	.qscratch_base_offset = SDM845_QSCRATCH_BASE_OFFSET,
> +	.qscratch_base_size = SDM845_QSCRATCH_SIZE,
> +	.dwc3_core_base_size = SDM845_DWC3_CORE_SIZE,
> +	.hs_phy_irq_index = 1,
> +	.dp_hs_phy_irq_index = 4,
> +	.dm_hs_phy_irq_index = 3,
> +	.ss_phy_irq_index = 2
> +};
> +
> +static const struct acpi_device_id dwc3_qcom_acpi_match[] = {
> +	{ "QCOM2430", (unsigned long)&sdm845_acpi_pdata },
> +	{ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dwc3_qcom_acpi_match);

Analog to of_device_get_match_data() there seems to be a
acpi_device_get_match_data(), if you use this you should be able to
have you acpi_device_id array next to the of_device_id.

> +
>  static int dwc3_qcom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

It seems that all that's left unconditional on ACPI_HANDLE() in this
function are the optional pieces and the tail. Wouldn't it be cleaner to
split it out in different functions?

Regards,
Bjorn