public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	rafael@kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 22/57] drivers: i2c: Use generic helper to match device by acpi_dev
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 22:03:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190606200337.GA8739@kunai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1559577023-558-23-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 433 bytes --]


> -	dev = bus_find_device(&i2c_bus_type, NULL, adev,
> -			      i2c_acpi_find_match_device);
> +	dev = bus_find_device(&i2c_bus_type, NULL, adev, device_match_acpi_dev);

In general, this looks like a nice cleanup which I am in favour of.
However, I didn't understand why ACPI uses bus_find_device() but OF has
a seperate helper bus_find_device_by_of_node(). Why this inconsistency
of having a seperate helper here and not there?


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-06 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-03 15:49 [RFC PATCH 00/57] drivers: Consolidate device lookup helpers Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-03 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/57] drivers: i2c: i2c-core: Use bus_find_device_by_of_node helper Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-03 15:49 ` [RFC PATCH 22/57] drivers: i2c: Use generic helper to match device by acpi_dev Suzuki K Poulose
2019-06-04  9:27   ` Mika Westerberg
2019-06-06 20:03   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-06-10 12:49     ` Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190606200337.GA8739@kunai \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox