From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Saiyam Doshi Subject: Re: [v2 0/3] Fix issues reported by Coccinelle Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 22:39:06 +0530 Message-ID: <20190922170906.GB5589@SD> References: <20190917172758.GA11926@SD> <76e99512-8818-cec2-9e77-799e4c8481ab@web.de> <20190917181423.GB28182@ninjato> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190917181423.GB28182@ninjato> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang , Markus.Elfring@web.de Cc: Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:14:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:10:45PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > > Using cocciecheck to ensure there are no semantic issues in > > > i2c-qup driver. > > > > * This wording contains a typo. > > Doesn't matter to me for a cover letter as long as we can understand it. > > > * I would prefer to refer to a desired reduction of a few > > source code quality concerns. > > Not needed. I understand what is going on here. Markus - By "ensure", I mean there are no further cocciecheck issues at this point in time. And further, what changed is covered in individual patch changelog. So, I think this information is fine in cover. > > Can such a prefix be omitted? Can be, but I like to keep it. Thanks for review. -Saiyam