Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: pxa: migrate to new i2c_slave APIs

[Patrick Williams <alpawi@amazon.com>]

Thanks for the review Andy.

On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:29:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:59:59AM -0500, Patrick Williams wrote:
> There are quite a few people in the Cc list. I'm not sure they all are
> interested in this. I deliberately dropped few names, sorry, if I was mistaken.

Agree it was kind of a big list.  Just chose what was given to me by
get_maintainer.pl.  It seems like there isn't a direct identified
maintainer of this file.

> 
> > +		if (isr & ISR_RWM) {
> > +			u8 byte = 0;
> > +
> > +			i2c_slave_event(i2c->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED,
> > +					&byte);
> > +			writel(byte, _IDBR(i2c));
> > +		} else {
> > +			i2c_slave_event(i2c->slave, I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED,
> > +					NULL);
> > +		}
> 
> Hmm... Perhaps
> 
> 		u8 byte = 0;
> 
> 		i2c_slave_event(i2c->slave, I2C_SLAVE_READ_REQUESTED, &byte);
> 		if (isr & ISR_RWM)
> 			writel(byte, _IDBR(i2c));
> 

The two different paths also require READ_REQUEST vs WRITE_REQUESTED.  I
could do a ternary there but it seemed more obvious to just unroll the
logic.

-- 
- Patrick