From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sakari Ailus Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] at24: Support probing while off Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:28:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20200110112851.GC5440@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> References: <20200109154529.19484-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20200109154529.19484-6-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:51015 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727457AbgAJL3G (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:29:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: linux-i2c , Wolfram Sang , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rajmohan Mani , Tomasz Figa Hi Bartosz, On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:16:14PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > czw., 9 sty 2020 o 16:44 Sakari Ailus napisał(a): > > > > In certain use cases (where the chip is part of a camera module, and the > > camera module is wired together with a camera privacy LED), powering on > > the device during probe is undesirable. Add support for the at24 to > > execute probe while being powered off. For this to happen, a hint in form > > of a device property is required from the firmware. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus > > Why am I not Cc'ed on this patch? I'll make sure you'll be cc'd on any future versions of the patch. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus