From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c: i801: Fix iTCO_wdt resource creation if PMC is not present Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:03:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20200228170342.GC1130@ninjato> References: <20200226132122.62805-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="da4uJneut+ArUgXk" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200226132122.62805-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-hwmon-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Guenter Roeck , Jean Delvare , Wim Van Sebroeck , Martin Volf , Andy Shevchenko , Jarkko Nikula , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 04:21:19PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > This series aims to fix the issue reported by Martin Volf [1] that preven= ts > the nct6775 driver from loading. >=20 > I added Fixes tag to the last patch but not stable tag because the other > two patches it depends are not really stable material IMO. Please let me > know if there is a better way to organize these :) >=20 > I tested this on Intel Whiskey Lake based system (CNL derived) and on Com= et > Lake-V based system (SPT derived and the iTCO_wdt still works and I can s= ee > the expected resources in /proc/ioports and /proc/iomem. >=20 > The previous version of the patch series can be found here: >=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/20200225123802.88984-1-mika.westerb= erg@linux.intel.com/ >=20 > Changes from the previous version: >=20 > * Call request_region() also for iTCO_vendorsupport > * Drop the core populating ICH_RES_IO_SMI completely from i2c-i801.c >=20 > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/CAM1AHpQ4196tyD=3DHhBu-2donSsuoga= bkfP03v1YF26Q7_BgvgA@mail.gmail.com/ I can take this series via I2C. Just wanted to let you know that I am aiming for rc5, because I'd like to have this in linux-next for a week to make sure we don't regress again (despite all precautions) somewhere else. Thanks to everyone to get this regression handled in such a concentrated manner! --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAl5ZR+4ACgkQFA3kzBSg Kbb29A//YUY3JKyYa6plCWxNQj6H12cc6EdXrS4lOnESwx89pq9ITm98Juu/VPqe 41Y0idzm2RNeq9ez7J6lxzGfYul5TkAxex+FGirUlp5GwrtrpRq2WFptcCR66Vx3 Tx4hw4bnValX5pWvQegGpvCX0kvFvMu4/Lv47C8nCWEljm0L0j144MTgXfgzCRKb 1iElopnX9Y7c0p5SaJUmM13WjHi9Y4TloOjmeIcGjOpEcQ0YzdsPeFfuGpn17FhX Ninbdux+DM94gWEuK6e3Xc3HAyz3zQDN9b1MR0A/0UqjoeEUspa2yvSOEOcNcDDH KyD7No8DbVNc6n8dLmncQqf+jZ4yN2hPMy/6YaJGhjk40hJI8M1cYC3jVqj8bnYA ItjrjV7QANSUwP+Kne2qCf5rQ10P18SJXaDd8s8cWXBmOh1Y6U9XsaDRrbfuXBO1 t0Lr6ssJZ3/RCu+X8wVMAIqgBQkhV57T0HItN8xeNhS8HpSopXank5tKVhQaUx7N vy4E8AoTO/T/mkNdjiUFfhDCxRqUElM5V5gtYJEl+B5Bx//2f1doGMBa0A+UIOk4 oMsevqtEXyPacx7U7gaXbverDoLwppf2zNclJ9aSopCDoyHUBTjbvIw2aHQA3oyz uvhVF1Re0owL3aqfAuXbPQtUdLMdJRELXEIa0dcwOi89leiCdmc= =71Zy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da4uJneut+ArUgXk--