public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: dev: Fix the race between the release of i2c_dev and cdev
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 10:47:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200321094740.GB1856@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011150014.28177-1-haokexin@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3647 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:00:14PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> The struct cdev is embedded in the struct i2c_dev. In the current code,
> we would free the i2c_dev struct directly in put_i2c_dev(), but the
> cdev is manged by a kobject, and the release of it is not predictable.
> So it is very possible that the i2c_dev is freed before the cdev is
> entirely released. We can easily get the following call trace with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE and CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS enabled.
>   ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x38
>   WARNING: CPU: 19 PID: 1 at lib/debugobjects.c:325 debug_print_object+0xb0/0xf0
>   Modules linked in:
>   CPU: 19 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W         5.2.20-yocto-standard+ #120
>   Hardware name: Marvell OcteonTX CN96XX board (DT)
>   pstate: 80c00089 (Nzcv daIf +PAN +UAO)
>   pc : debug_print_object+0xb0/0xf0
>   lr : debug_print_object+0xb0/0xf0
>   sp : ffff00001292f7d0
>   x29: ffff00001292f7d0 x28: ffff800b82151788
>   x27: 0000000000000001 x26: ffff800b892c0000
>   x25: ffff0000124a2558 x24: 0000000000000000
>   x23: ffff00001107a1d8 x22: ffff0000116b5088
>   x21: ffff800bdc6afca8 x20: ffff000012471ae8
>   x19: ffff00001168f2c8 x18: 0000000000000010
>   x17: 00000000fd6f304b x16: 00000000ee79de43
>   x15: ffff800bc0e80568 x14: 79616c6564203a74
>   x13: 6e6968207473696c x12: 5f72656d6974203a
>   x11: ffff0000113f0018 x10: 0000000000000000
>   x9 : 000000000000001f x8 : 0000000000000000
>   x7 : ffff0000101294cc x6 : 0000000000000000
>   x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001
>   x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : 0000000000000000
>   x1 : 387fc15c8ec0f200 x0 : 0000000000000000
>   Call trace:
>    debug_print_object+0xb0/0xf0
>    __debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x19c/0x228
>    debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x1c/0x28
>    kfree+0x250/0x440
>    put_i2c_dev+0x68/0x78
>    i2cdev_detach_adapter+0x60/0xc8
>    i2cdev_notifier_call+0x3c/0x70
>    notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xe8
>    blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x64/0x88
>    device_del+0x74/0x380
>    device_unregister+0x54/0x78
>    i2c_del_adapter+0x278/0x2d0
>    unittest_i2c_bus_remove+0x3c/0x80
>    platform_drv_remove+0x30/0x50
>    device_release_driver_internal+0xf4/0x1c0
>    driver_detach+0x58/0xa0
>    bus_remove_driver+0x84/0xd8
>    driver_unregister+0x34/0x60
>    platform_driver_unregister+0x20/0x30
>    of_unittest_overlay+0x8d4/0xbe0
>    of_unittest+0xae8/0xb3c
>    do_one_initcall+0xac/0x450
>    do_initcall_level+0x208/0x224
>    kernel_init_freeable+0x2d8/0x36c
>    kernel_init+0x18/0x108
>    ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
>   irq event stamp: 3934661
>   hardirqs last  enabled at (3934661): [<ffff00001009fa04>] debug_exception_exit+0x4c/0x58
>   hardirqs last disabled at (3934660): [<ffff00001009fb14>] debug_exception_enter+0xa4/0xe0
>   softirqs last  enabled at (3934654): [<ffff000010081d94>] __do_softirq+0x46c/0x628
>   softirqs last disabled at (3934649): [<ffff0000100b4a1c>] irq_exit+0x104/0x118
> 
> This is a common issue when using cdev embedded in a struct.
> Fortunately, we already have a mechanism to solve this kind of issue.
> Please see commit 233ed09d7fda ("chardev: add helper function to
> register char devs with a struct device") for more detail.
> 
> In this patch, we choose to embed the struct device into the i2c_dev,
> and use the API provided by the commit 233ed09d7fda to make sure that
> the release of i2c_dev and cdev are in sequence.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>

Applied to for-next with stable added, thanks!


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-21  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20191011150014.28177-1-haokexin@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20191125193204.GA14257@kunai>
2020-03-16  4:54   ` [PATCH] i2c: dev: Fix the race between the release of i2c_dev and cdev Kevin Hao
2020-03-20 18:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-21  4:05   ` Kevin Hao
2020-03-21  9:47     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-21  9:47 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200321094740.GB1856@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox