linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot <syzbot+ed71512d469895b5b34e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i801: Fix memory corruption in i801_isr_byte_done()
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 18:51:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323185120.1a5cd734@endymion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200323093733.GA26299@kadam>

On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:37:33 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:11:06PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Definitely not correct. The first byte of the block data array MUST be
> > the size of the block read. Even if the code above does not do the
> > right thing, removing the line will not help.
> >   
> 
> Yeah.  I misread the code.
> 
> > Is it possible that kasan got this wrong due to the convoluted logic?
> > It's late and I'll check again tomorrow morning but the code looks OK
> > to me.  
> 
> KASan doesn't work like that.  It works at runtime and doesn't care
> about the logic.
> 
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=426fc8b1c1b63fb0af524d839dfcf452f2d858e2
> 
> At the bottom of the report it shows that we're in a field of f9
> poisoned data so it's not priv->len which is wrong.  (My patch was way
> off).
> 
> mm/kasan/kasan.h:#define KASAN_VMALLOC_INVALID   0xF9  /* unallocated space in vmapped page */
> 
> The logic looks okay to me too.  So possibly this was a race condition
> or even memory corruption in an unrelated part of the kernel.

I checked out the exact kernel version this report was generated for,
and the faulty line is:

  592:			priv->data[priv->count++] = inb(SMBBLKDAT(priv));

This would suggest the problem is with priv->count growing beyond the
end of the array, however the fact that we land in a memory spot full
of 0xF9 kind of excludes this possibility (the data before the spot
would contain different data if it was the case).

The other option is that priv->count wasn't initialized at the time
it is used. However I can't see how this could happen, given that the
priv structure is kzalloc'd.

So, to be honest I can't really see how priv->count can get wrong. So
I would be tempted to lend towards the theory that the i2c-i801 driver
was a collateral victim of a memory corruption happening somewhere else
in the kernel. Wouldn't Kasan catch this too? Is it possible to access
the other Kasan reports from the same test run?

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

      reply	other threads:[~2020-03-23 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14  6:34 KASAN: vmalloc-out-of-bounds Write in i801_isr syzbot
2020-01-14  7:34 ` [PATCH] i2c: i801: Fix memory corruption in i801_isr_byte_done() Dan Carpenter
2020-02-22 12:45   ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-20 14:57     ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-22 18:08       ` Jean Delvare
2020-03-22 21:10         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-22 21:12         ` Wolfram Sang
2020-03-22 22:11   ` Jean Delvare
2020-03-23  9:37     ` Dan Carpenter
2020-03-23 17:51       ` Jean Delvare [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200323185120.1a5cd734@endymion \
    --to=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=djkurtz@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+ed71512d469895b5b34e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).